Reynolds v. Allstate Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 12 January 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-1408,79-1408 |
| Citation | 633 F.2d 1208 |
| Parties | F. M. REYNOLDS et ux (Reynolds, Earlene), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion November 6, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 629 F.2d 1111)
Before GOLDBERG, GARZA and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.
On petition for rehearing, 629 F.2d 1111, defendant-appellant Allstate Insurance Company has raised two points in contesting the award of attorney's fees in this case. The issue of the availability of fees under the current version of Article 2226 presents a new and difficult task of interpreting recent statutory amendments-and one which was overlooked in the briefs and arguments in the original hearing. We now write to analyze the problems concerning the availability of fees in this case and to deny the petition for rehearing, except insofar as it relates to the availability of attorney's fees.
Allstate's first claim is that the case of First Preferred Ins. Co. v. Bell, 587 S.W.2d 798 () bars the recovery of fees on suits to recover under a contract of insurance. In Bell, the Texas Appellate Court was faced with deciding whether the term "oral or written contracts" included contracts of insurance. The Bell court relied on a long line of Texas cases which had held that Article 2226 was penal in character and should be strictly construed. Since Article 2226 provided for recovery only on "oral or written contracts" and not on "contracts of insurance," strict construction forced the Bell court to conclude that no attorney's fees were available in cases seeking recovery on contracts of insurance. However, since Bell, and apparently in reaction to the long line of Texas cases holding that Article 2226 was penal in character and must be strictly construed, the Texas legislature has expressly amended the statute (as noted in the original opinion, 629 F.2d at 1117 (1980)) to provide both that the and that the Under all but the most strict construction, a contract of insurance is included within the term "oral or written contracts;" without a doubt, a liberal construction of "written contracts" includes contracts of insurance.
Since Article 2226 clearly includes contracts of insurance within the term "oral and written contracts," we must address for the first time and with the aid of very little briefing, appellant's second issue: whether fire insurance contracts are exempted from Article 2226 by operation of that Article's exclusion provision. This provision expressly notes:
The provisions hereof shall not apply to contracts of insurers issued by insurers subject to the provisions of the Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act (Article 21.21-2, Insurance Code), nor shall it apply to contracts of any insurer subject to the provisions of Article 3.62, Insurance Code, or to Chapter 387, Acts of the 55th Legislature, Regular Session, 1957, as amended (Article 3.62-1, Vernon's Texas Insurance Code), or to Article 21.21, Insurance Code, as amended, or to Chapter 9,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Grapevine Excavation Inc. v. Maryland Lloyds
...(5th Cir. 1995); Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Vacuum Tanks, Inc., 975 F.2d 1130, 1133 (5th Cir. 1992); see also Reynolds v. Allstate Ins. Co., 633 F.2d 1208, 1209 (5th Cir. 1981)(reaching same result under Art. 2226). But one case seems to be contrary. See Gulf Chem. & Metallurgical Corp. v. As......
-
Hochheim Prairie Farm Mut. Ins. Ass'n v. Burnett
...2226. It cites Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Fraiman, 588 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1979), and Reynolds v. Allstate Ins. Co., 633 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1981) in support of their position that the statute should be strictly Despite the seemingly plain language behind article 22......
-
Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. Murray Inv. Co.
...v. Miller Brewing Co., 643 F.2d 308 (5th Cir. 1981); Reynolds v. Allstate Ins. Co., 629 F.2d 1111, modified on rehearing, 633 F.2d 1208, 1209 (5th Cir. 1981). We believe the plain language of Article 2226 requires allowance of attorney's fees in this case and we, therefore, hold the Distric......
-
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Clark, 13-84-251-CV
...[14th Dist.] 1979, no writ); Reynolds v. Allstate Insurance Co., 629 F.2d 1111 (5th Cir.1980), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 633 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir.1981) (opinion on petition for In Standard Fire Insurance v. Fraiman, the Houston Court applied a strict construction to the 1978 version of......