Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., Inc., Nos. 47100
| Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
| Writing for the Court | CRANDALL; KAROHL, P.J., and REINHARD |
| Citation | 662 S.W.2d 905 |
| Decision Date | 20 December 1983 |
| Docket Number | 47101,Nos. 47100 |
| Parties | J.H. REYNOLDS, et al., Appellants, v. BRIARWOOD DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., et al., Respondents. Andrew BICKEL, et al., Appellants, v. BRIARWOOD DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., et al., Respondents. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Young By and Through Young v. Davis, No. 14322
...Bradford, 611 S.W.2d 343, 351 (Mo.App.1980). Also see Skatoff v. Alfend, 411 S.W.2d 169 (Mo.1966); Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., 662 S.W.2d 905 (Mo.App.1983); P.I.C. Leasing, Inc. v. Roy A. Scheperle Const. Co., Inc., 489 S.W.2d 219 An analysis of the cases also reveals a limitatio......
-
First Cmty. Credit Union v. Levison, No. ED 98352.
...of which must be disposed of before there is an appealable judgment under Rule 74.01(b). See e.g., Reynolds v. Briarwood Dev. Co., Inc., 662 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App. E.D.1983) (“if a counterclaim is pleaded and submitted, a finding must be made disposing of the counterclaim, or else, the ju......
-
Southern Missouri Bank v. Fogle, No. 14998
...The respondent's brief must specify the same points of error raised in the motion for new trial. Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., 662 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App.1983). Here the motion for new trial extensively enumerated allegations of error. The bank's brief presents ten of these points......
-
Wright v. Martin, No. 13404
...necessarily carries with it a finding against the defendant on the defendant's counterclaim. See Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., 662 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App.1983); Todd, supra, 585 S.W.2d at 524; Baumstark, supra, 540 S.W.2d at 612. See also Moore v. Luna, 626 S.W.2d 417, 418 The que......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Young By and Through Young v. Davis, No. 14322
...Bradford, 611 S.W.2d 343, 351 (Mo.App.1980). Also see Skatoff v. Alfend, 411 S.W.2d 169 (Mo.1966); Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., 662 S.W.2d 905 (Mo.App.1983); P.I.C. Leasing, Inc. v. Roy A. Scheperle Const. Co., Inc., 489 S.W.2d 219 An analysis of the cases also reveals a limitatio......
-
First Cmty. Credit Union v. Levison, No. ED 98352.
...of which must be disposed of before there is an appealable judgment under Rule 74.01(b). See e.g., Reynolds v. Briarwood Dev. Co., Inc., 662 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App. E.D.1983) (“if a counterclaim is pleaded and submitted, a finding must be made disposing of the counterclaim, or else, the ju......
-
Southern Missouri Bank v. Fogle, No. 14998
...The respondent's brief must specify the same points of error raised in the motion for new trial. Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., 662 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App.1983). Here the motion for new trial extensively enumerated allegations of error. The bank's brief presents ten of these points......
-
Wright v. Martin, 13404
...necessarily carries with it a finding against the defendant on the defendant's counterclaim. See Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., 662 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App.1983); Todd, supra, 585 S.W.2d at 524; Baumstark, supra, 540 S.W.2d at 612. See also Moore v. Luna, 626 S.W.2d 417, 418 The que......
Request a trial to view additional results