Reynolds v. Watts, 93-507

Decision Date06 December 1993
Docket NumberNo. 93-507,93-507
Citation315 Ark. 226,864 S.W.2d 870
PartiesJimmy D. REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. Jerry WATTS, A Law Enforcement Officer in his Official Capacity and Personally, Appellee.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Ronald G. Woodruff, Fayetteville, for appellant.

Victra L. Fewell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

HAYS, Justice.

Appellant Jimmy D. Reynolds brought this action against Officers Jerry Watts (appellee) and Harold Moe, alleging use of excessive force in the arrest of Jimmy D. Reynolds. The trial court granted a motion to dismiss as to Harold Moe and Reynolds has appealed. The action still pends as to Jerry Watts.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of compliance with Ark.R.Civ.P. 54(b), an indispensable element of our jurisdiction which we address on our own. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Thomas, 312 Ark. 429, 850 S.W.2d 4 (1993).

Appeal Dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Herringer v. Mercantile Bank of Jonesboro, Arkansas
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1993
  • Cortese v. Atlantic Richfield, 93-981
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 31, 1994
    ...finally determined or disposed of, and the order is therefore not a final judgment in compliance with Rule 54(b). See Reynolds v. Watts, 315 Ark. 226, 864 S.W.2d 870 (1993). ARCP Rule 54(b) provides that a trial court may direct a final judgment as to fewer than all the parties or claims, "......
  • Gentry v. State, CR
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1993

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT