Rhind v. Naylor
| Decision Date | 09 November 1992 |
| Citation | Rhind v. Naylor, 589 N.Y.S.2d 605, 187 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992) |
| Parties | Christine RHIND, Respondent, v. Richard D. NAYLOR, Appellant, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Rivkin, Radler, Bayh, Hart & Kremer, Uniondale (Evan H. Krinick and Laura J. Reimer, of counsel), for appellant.
Agoglia, Fassberg, Magee & Crowe, P.C., Mineola (E. Kevin Agoglia, of counsel), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and HARWOOD, BALLETTA, ROSENBLATT and EIBER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Richard D. Naylor appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated September 20, 1990, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in its entirety.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The medical reports submitted by the appellant, prepared by the plaintiff's treating physicians, establish that the plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) (see, Pagano v. Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268, 587 N.Y.S.2d 692). Those reports show that the plaintiff suffered mild cervical and lumbar sprains. We find that these injuries are insignificant within the meaning of the statute (see, Serio v. Radin, 168 A.D.2d 612, 563 N.Y.S.2d 452; Konco v. E.T.C. Leasing Corp., 160 A.D.2d 680, 553 N.Y.S.2d 457; Delfino v. Davey, 159 A.D.2d 604, 552 N.Y.S.2d 658). The subjective quality of the plaintiff's pain does not fall within the objective verbal definition of serious injury as contemplated in the no-fault law (see, Konco v. E.T.C. Leasing Corp., supra; Delfino v. Davey, supra). In addition, the plaintiff has failed to present any evidence establishing that she was...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Jones v. U.S.
...supports a finding that there was little, if any, change in plaintiff's neck and back functions. See Rhind v. Naylor, 187 A.D.2d 498, 498-99, 589 N.Y.S.2d 605, 606 (2d Dept.1992) (finding that "mild" cervical and lumbar sprains are insignificant within the meaning of the No-Fault statute). ......
-
Yanez v. City of New York
...significant limitation. See, Scheer v. Koubek, 70 N.Y.2d 678, 679, 518 N.Y.S.2d 788, 512 N.E.2d 309 (1987), and Rhind v. Naylor, 187 A.D.2d 498, 589 N.Y.S.2d 605 (2d Dept.1992). Thus, Yanez's deposition testimony does not support his claim of significant limitation under the "no-fault" Ther......
-
Baston v. Romero
...within the meaning of the No-Fault statute, See, Cannizzaro v. King, 187 AD2d 842, 589 N.Y.S.2d 698 (1992); Rhind v. Naylor, 187 A.D.2d 498, 589 N.Y.S.2d 605 (1992); Delfino v. Davey, 159 A.D.2d 604, 552 N.Y.S.2d 658 (1992). Sprains and contusions do not establish a serious injury, Sciarrin......
-
Shimon v. Wong, CV 94-4745.
...establishes nothing more than a mild back sprain which is insignificant within the meaning of the statute. (see, Rhind v. Naylor, 187 A.D.2d 498, 589 N.Y.S.2d 605). Id. 608 N.Y.S.2d at 682. In the Court's view, the plaintiff's claim that she will endure pain and suffering in the future is s......