Rhodes v. ANCHOR RODE CONDO. HOMEOWNER'S

Decision Date09 November 1998
Docket NumberNo. S98A1297.,S98A1297.
Citation270 Ga. 139,508 S.E.2d 648
PartiesRHODES v. ANCHOR RODE CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Frank Armstrong, III, Stewart, Melvin & Frost, LLP, Gainesville, for Blaine Rhodes.

Cary Douglas Cox, Blairsville, Lawrence S. Sorgen, Sorgen & Schindelar, Hiawassee, for Anchor Rode Condominium Homeowner's Association, Inc., et al.

FLETCHER, Presiding Justice.

A portion of the septic system for the Anchor Rode Condominium Homeowner's Association, Inc. lies on a 1.74 acre tract of land owned by Blaine and Sally E. Rhodes.Anchor Rode sought a judgment against Blaine Rhodes declaring the validity of its sewage system disposal easement and a permanent injunction enjoining Rhodes from interfering with the use of the easement.Rhodes counterclaimed for a judgment declaring that the Rhodes' property is not burdened with the easement and a permanent injunction preventing Anchor Rode from discharging sewage on the Rhodes' property.The trial court granted the declaratory and injunctive relief sought by Anchor Rode and denied the relief sought by Rhodes.On appeal, the controlling issue is whether the foreclosure of a security deed predating the easement extinguished Anchor Rode's easement.Because the security deed grantees did not join in granting the easement or otherwise subordinate their rights in the servient property, the foreclosure extinguished the easement and we reverse.

In 1980, Almont Lindsey purchased the property at issue from Ray and Gladys Hagberg and Lindsey executed a deed to secure debt in favor of the Hagbergs.Lindsey subsequently conveyed the property to Windjammer Lodge, Inc., subject to the Hagbergs' deed to secure debt.Windjammer Lodge granted a perpetual nonexclusive easement for the installation and maintenance of a septic tank sewage disposal system on the property to serve Anchor Rode Condominium.The easement was recorded in 1987 and the rights have descended to Anchor Rode.The Hagbergs, however, did not join in the grant of the easement, subordinate their security deed to the easement, or release the servient property from the security deed.When the secured indebtedness was not paid, the Hagbergs' foreclosed their security deed and conveyed the property to Blaine Rhodes and Sally E. Rhodes, the purchasers at the foreclosure sale, by deed under power in 1991.

1.A deed to secure debt (security deed) is peculiar to Georgia law.1It conveys legal title in the real property to the grantee with the grantor retaining an equitable estate, which ordinarily entitles the grantor and his assigns to possession so long as there is no default under the terms of the deed.2Because legal title remains in the grantee until satisfaction of those terms, all subsequent conveyances of the real property remain subject to the security deed,3 unless the grantee releases the property by conveyance or contractually subordinates his rights.

Anchor Rode claims its easement rights through express grant from Windjammer Lodge, successor-in-title to Lindsey, the grantor of the security deed.However, the easement grant was conveyed subsequent to the delivery and recording of the security deed and the Hagbergs, the grantees of the security deed, did not join in the easement grant, subordinate their rights, or otherwise release the servient property.Therefore, the easement remained subject to the security deed.

2.A valid foreclosure of a security deed not only vests legal title in the purchaser, it also divests all of the grantor's rights in the property as well as the rights of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Kelley v. McCormack (In re Mitchell)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Georgia
    • 23 Marzo 2016
  • 905 Bernina Ave. Coop., Inc. v. Smith/Burns LLC
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 27 Junio 2017
    ...debt, leaving EDC with a right of possession and redemption in the property. See generally Rhodes v. Anchor Rode Condo. Homeowner's Assn. , 270 Ga. 139, 139-140 (1), 508 S.E.2d 648 (1998) (discussing property rights held by grantor and grantee of deed to secure debt); Turner Advertising Co.......
  • McCarter v. Bankers Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 1 Diciembre 2000
    ...of possession of the realty until the secured debt has been satisfied in full. OCGA § 44-14-60; Rhodes v. Anchor Rode Condo. Homeowner's Assn., 270 Ga. 139, 140(1), (2), 508 S.E.2d 648 (1998); Connolly v. State, 199 Ga.App. 887, 889, 406 S.E.2d 222 (1991); Commercial Bank v. Stafford, 149 G......
  • In re Cook
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • 11 Mayo 2020
    ...Cochran (In re Howard) , 351 B.R. 251, 255 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2006).13 Morgan, 115 B.R. at 401 ; Rhodes v. Anchor Rode Condominium Homeowner's Assoc., Inc., 270 Ga. 139, 508 S.E.2d 648, 650 (1998) ; Carrington v. Citizens' Bank of Waynesboro, 144 Ga. 52, 85 S.E. 1027 (1915). Debtor raised no ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT