Rhodes v. Smith, No. 20-89.

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Citation141 S.Ct. 365 (Mem),208 L.Ed.2d 92
Decision Date05 October 2020
Parties Thomas Daniel RHODES, Petitioner, v. Michelle SMITH, Warden.
Docket NumberNo. 20-89.

141 S.Ct. 365 (Mem)
208 L.Ed.2d 92

Thomas Daniel RHODES, Petitioner,
v.

Michelle SMITH, Warden.

No. 20-89.

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 5, 2020


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Feather v. United States, 20-3371
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • November 22, 2021
    ...based on "false" expert testimony would violate the Due Process Clause. 950 F.3d 1032, 1036 n.2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 365, 208 L.Ed.2d 92 (2020). Applying the "clear and convincing evidence" test for successive habeas petitions, we concluded in Rhodes that the ......
1 cases
  • Feather v. United States, 20-3371
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • November 22, 2021
    ...based on "false" expert testimony would violate the Due Process Clause. 950 F.3d 1032, 1036 n.2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 365, 208 L.Ed.2d 92 (2020). Applying the "clear and convincing evidence" test for successive habeas petitions, we concluded in Rhodes that the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT