Rhodes v. Smith, No. 20-89.
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | 141 S.Ct. 365 (Mem),208 L.Ed.2d 92 |
| Decision Date | 05 October 2020 |
| Parties | Thomas Daniel RHODES, Petitioner, v. Michelle SMITH, Warden. |
| Docket Number | No. 20-89. |
141 S.Ct. 365 (Mem)
208 L.Ed.2d 92
Thomas Daniel RHODES, Petitioner,
v.
Michelle SMITH, Warden.
No. 20-89.
Supreme Court of the United States.
October 5, 2020
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 practice notes
-
Feather v. United States, 20-3371
...based on "false" expert testimony would violate the Due Process Clause. 950 F.3d 1032, 1036 n.2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 365, 208 L.Ed.2d 92 (2020). Applying the "clear and convincing evidence" test for successive habeas petitions, we concluded in Rhodes that the ......
1 cases
-
Feather v. United States, 20-3371
...based on "false" expert testimony would violate the Due Process Clause. 950 F.3d 1032, 1036 n.2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 141 S. Ct. 365, 208 L.Ed.2d 92 (2020). Applying the "clear and convincing evidence" test for successive habeas petitions, we concluded in Rhodes that the ......