Rhyner v. Hartl
Decision Date | 10 February 1942 |
Citation | 239 Wis. 589,2 N.W.2d 248 |
Parties | RHYNER v. HARTL. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Wood County; H. J. Severson, Judge.
Reversed.
FOWLER, J., dissenting.Action begun February 20, 1939, by Fred A. Rhyner, as administrator of the estate of Robert Connor, deceased, against L. A. Hartl for an accounting. John L. Sauber was impleaded. Judgment was for plaintiff against Hartl. Hartl appeals.
The complaint shows that at the time of his death Robert Connor was indebted to the American National Bank of Marshfield upon a judgment in the sum of $5,574.71 with interest and to the First National Bank of Stevens Pointin the sum of $5,357.80. That he was the owner of a one-third interest in certain timber holdings, the balance being held one-third by the First National Bank of Marshfield and one-third by W. D. Connor, Jr., and others. That the real estate was subject to a judgment lien for $3,424.22, principal, interest and costs, in favor of the Stratford State Bank. That the lien was a prior lien. That defendant Hartl acquired by assignment from the Stratford Bank its judgment. That Hartl and the First National Bank of Stevens Point purchased the interest of said deceased Robert Connor in the real estate for the sum of $6,000. It is further alleged that plaintiff was induced to believe that the premises were unsalable and that the deceased's interest was of no greater value than $6,000. That Hartl well knew the character and value of the property and that it was reasonably worth substantially more than $6,000. That plaintiff relied upon the statements and representations made and believed them to be true. That he accepted the offer and filed a petition in the county court for an order authorizing him as administrator to sell and transfer the title of said deceased in said premises free and clear of the lien of the prior judgment of the Stratford State Bank and outstanding taxes. That an order was granted authorizing a deed from plaintiff to Hartl and J. W. Dunegan as trustees upon condition that there be paid to plaintiff $6,000 in cash and directing plaintiff to pay to the First National Bank of Stevens Point $384.64 to reimburse said bank for taxes redeemed by it and also to pay the sum of $4,109.24 with interest in redemption of said premises under the execution sale upon the judgment in favor of the Stratford State Bank and to hold the balance subject to the further order of the court. It is further alleged that the real estate was later sold in connection with the other two one-third interests for such a price that defendant Hartl received $8,229.41 for his share and that he refuses to apply the same upon the claim against the Connor estate of the American National Bank for whom it is alleged he was acting as trustee. That Hartl claims title to the undivided one-half interest in the decedent's one-third interest in said premises as having been conveyed to him individually by said administrator's deed.
The defendant Hartl denies having made any representations or statements of the character complained of and denies that he purchased the Stratford Bank judgment and entered into the agreement to purchase decedent's one-third interest on behalf of the American National Bank.
The plaintiff testified on direct examination concerning the meeting at which the original purchase was agreed upon as follows:
* * *”
Mr. Fisher gave this testimony as to the meeting:
A number of other witnesses testified concerning the meeting but the foregoing...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Guderyon v. Wis. Tel. Co.
-
Maleki v. Fine-Lando Clinic Chartered, S.C., FINE-LANDO
...fulfilling obligations and receiving benefits of marital contract stated a cause of action under sec. 134.01); Rhyner v. Hartl, 239 Wis. 589, 594, 2 N.W.2d 248, 251 (1942) (viable cause of action requires "a right in the plaintiff and a wrongful invasion of that right by the defendant"). Wh......
-
Lompre v. Venetjoki
...would have in bringing a cause of action. [63 MICHAPP 268] Crowther v. Baird, 195 Kan. 134, 402 P.2d 753 (1965); Rhyner v. Hartl, 239 Wis. 589, 2 N.W.2d 248 (1942); 34 C.J.S. Executors and Administrators § 692, p. 665. It is clear that the disappeared person could not bring an action on beh......