Ricard v. United States
| Decision Date | 23 April 1945 |
| Docket Number | No. 11272.,11272. |
| Parties | RICARD v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
P. Guy Crews, of Jacksonville, Fla., and Charles O. Andrews, Jr., of Orlando, Fla., for appellant.
Herbert S. Phillips, U. S. Atty., of Tampa, Fla., for appellee.
Before SIBLEY, WALLER, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
The appellant Ricard was convicted of extortion and sentenced to one year's imprisonment. He waived the assistance of counsel for his trial and again when he came to be sentenced. No request was made for a stenographic report of the trial and none was had. The bill of exceptions, made as such bills have traditionally been made, from memory, is certified by the judge after some corrections to be true and to contain all the material evidence in narrative form. Ricard entered his own appeal, stating his grounds of appeal, which did not refer to the lack of a stenographer. He now appears by counsel, who specifies as the only errors to be urged, 1. That the court erred in failing to provide a court reporter as required by the Act of Jan. 20, 1944, 28 U.S.C.A. § 9a; and 2. That the court erred in settling a bill of exceptions based on the memory of the parties instead of upon a transcript of the proceedings by the official court reporter.
The cited Act in paragraph (a) enacts that each district court "shall appoint one or more court reporters." Paragraph (b) requires that one of such reporters "shall attend at each session of the court * * * and shall record verbatim by shorthand or by mechanical means (1) all proceedings in criminal cases had in open court * * *." Paragraph (c) says he shall receive an annual salary. We judicially know that at the time of this trial the qualifications and the salary scale for the reporters had been fixed by the Judicial Conference as required by the Act, but Congress had not made any appropriation for their payment; and that few if any appointees had accepted and entered upon their office. No official reporter existed in the Southern District of Florida, though stenographers had been appointed for civil cases under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 80, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
Notwithstanding the mandatory language of the Act above quoted, it is plain that no one will accept appointment and do the work of court reporter if there is no provision to pay him, and that the court cannot require the verbatim record of proceedings in criminal cases if there is no...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ladner v. United States
...1944, Congress had not appropriated funds for the payment of court reporters at the time of the trial in June 1944. See Richard v. United States, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 895; Vickers v. United States, 8 Cir., 157 F.2d 285. 1. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1952), 28 U.S.C.A. § 2. Though the § 2255 issue was me......
-
Marsh v. United States, CIV-74-526-D.
...reporter to make a verbatim record of proceedings in criminal cases. Vickers v. United States, 157 F.2d 285 (CA8 1946); Ricard v. United States, 148 F.2d 895 (CA5 1945). A trial in which the testimony is not stenographically transcribed does not violate the Constitution. United States v. St......
-
Rogers v. State
... ... Prosecution for ... crime should be fair: ... 'The United ... States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary ... party to a controversy, but of a ... ...
-
Banks v. State
...testimony by a stenographer. One such trial was that held in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Ricard v. United States, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 895, 896. In that case there was no request for a stenographic report of the trial. The bill of exceptions was made from memory, ......