Rice v. Sanger
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | Rice v. Sanger, 144 U.S. 197, 12 S.Ct. 664, 36 L.Ed. 403 (1892) |
| Decision Date | 28 March 1892 |
| Parties | RICE v. SANGER |
J. D. McCleverty, for the motion.
E. F. Ware, opposed.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE.
This was an action commenced by one Rice against Sanger et al. in the district court of Bourbon county, Kan., wherein judgment was rendered February 27, 1888, in favor of plaintiff. The cause was thereupon taken by the defendants to the supreme court of that state, the judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views of the court as expressed in its written opinion. To review this judgment a writ of error from this court was allowed, but after that the case went back to the state district court in...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Morgan v. Thompson
... ... 405, 23 L.Ed. 136; Crosby v ... Buchanan, 23 Wall. 420, 23 L.Ed. 138; Commissioners ... v. Lucas, 93 U.S. 108, 23 L.Ed. 822; Rice v ... Sanger, 144 U.S. 197, 12 Sup.Ct. 664, 36 L.Ed. 403 ... Whether the question be considered from the standpoint of ... reason or of ... ...
-
Great Western Tel Co v. Burnham
...could be had. Rev. St. § 709. The writ is dismissed.' See, also, Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3, 1 Sup. Ct. 15; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197, 12 Sup. Ct. 664; Rutland R. Co. v. Central Vermont R. Co., 159 U. S. 630, 638, 16 Sup. Ct. 113; In re Sanford Fork & Tool Co., 160 U. S. 247, ......
-
Union Mut Life Ins Co v. Kirchoff
...3 Wheat. 433; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3, 1 Sup. Ct. 15; Johnson v. Keith, 117 U. S. 199, 6 Sup. Ct. 669; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197, 12 Sup. Ct. 664; Meagher v. Manufacturing Co., 145 U. S. 608, 12 Sup. Ct. 876; Hume v. Bowie, 148 U. S. 245, 13 Sup. Ct. 582; Werner v. City Cou......
-
MacLeod v. Graven
...14 Sup.Ct. 356; Brown v. Baxter, 146 U.S. 619, 13 Aup.Ct. 260; Meagher v. Manufacturing Co., 145 U.S. 608, 12 Sup.Ct. 876; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U.S. 197, 12 Sup.Ct. 664; Johnson v. Keith, 117 U.S. 199, 6 Sup.Ct. Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U.S. 3, 1 Sup.Ct. 15; Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat, 43......
Get Started for Free