Rich Intern. Airways, Inc. v. Cahvasquis, AF-46

Decision Date14 July 1982
Docket NumberNo. AF-46,AF-46
Citation416 So.2d 902
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
PartiesRICH INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS, INC., and Hartford Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Luis CAHVASQUIS, Appellee.

Mark L. Zientz, of Williams & Zientz, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Mark J. Feldman, Miami, for appellee.

SHIVERS, Judge.

The employer/carrier appeal the deputy commissioner's workers' compensation order awarding Cahvasquis costs of nursing services and attorney's fee. We modify the award for nursing services and the award of attorney's fee and affirm the order as modified.

On December 10, 1979, Cahvasquis suffered an industrial injury during the course and scope of his employment. Following the injury, appellee entered the hospital where he remained until December 14, 1979. Although Cahvasquis made a timely request for nursing services, the carrier refused payment. Several days after he left the hospital, Cahvasquis' wife arrived from New York and treated his injuries for 15 days. Thereafter, appellee cared for himself. On July 2, 1981, the deputy commissioner entered an order awarding Cahvasquis costs of nursing services for four weeks, costs of proceedings and attorney's fee.

Section 440.13, Fla.Stat. (1979) provides for payment by the employer of fees for nursing services. When a spouse provides services which go beyond that which would normally be provided on a gratuitous basis, benefits for nursing services may be awarded. Silver Springs Sportswear v. Marlin, 389 So.2d 702 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The record provides an adequate basis for the award for the fifteen days the wife cared for the claimant. The record, however, indicates the claimant cared for himself before the wife arrived and after she left. Although Section 440.13(1) provides for an award if the employer refuses to pay and the employee personally expends money for nursing services, the statute does not provide for the payment of benefits for nursing services for the time during which the claimant cared for himself. Accordingly, the award was inappropriate to the extent it granted benefits for nursing services beyond fifteen days. The order below is modified to grant appellee $1,200 for nursing services reflecting costs of these services at the rate accepted by the deputy commissioner. The award of an attorney's fee is justified by the record [Landers Construction v. Delauder, 417 So.2d 989 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Section 440.34(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1979) ], but not to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Walt Disney World Co. v. Harrison
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 30, 1983
    ...in awarding any benefits because "the claimant cared for herself and actually never used the services." Rich International Airways v. Cahvasquis, 416 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Therefore, Disney argues, the award to claimant is a prohibited windfall because the act only reimburses a cla......
  • Don Harris Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Henderson, AX-180
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 22, 1984
    ...1st DCA 1982). When services go beyond these, however, benefits for attendant care may be awarded. See Rich International Airways v. Cahvasquis, 416 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Such services have been defined as dressing, Craftsmen's Village v. Benach, 8 FCR 372 (1974); bathing, Craftsme......
  • May v. Broward Correctional Inst., BR-13
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 23, 1987
    ...care under section 440.13(2)(d). Dalton v. Orange County Sheriff, 503 So.2d 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Rich International Airways v. Cahvasquis, 416 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). REVERSED and remanded for further BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. ...
  • CATV Support Services, Inc. v. Lohr, BM-256
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 1987
    ...[what] would normally be provided on a gratuitous basis...." Wlat Disney World, 443 So.2d at 393, (citing Rich International Airways v. Cahvasquis, 416 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)). First, although it is the claimant's burden to "prove by competent, substantial evidence the quantity, qual......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT