Richardson v. Richardson, 30247 Summary Calendar.
| Citation | 437 F.2d 109 |
| Decision Date | 06 January 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 30247 Summary Calendar.,30247 Summary Calendar. |
| Parties | David C. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elliott L. RICHARDSON, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
William C. Davis, Jr., John B. L'Engle, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
John L. Briggs, U. S. Atty., John D. Roberts, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant-appellee.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
Appellant seeks review of an order of the district court affirming a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare which denied his application for social security disability benefits.
We are not to reweigh evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the Secretary. The role of the court is to determine if there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Secretary's decision. Rome v. Finch, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 1329.
The gravamen of appellant's complaint is that the medical evidence to sustain his disability prior to and since the date he was last insured was ignored in the lower proceedings. We find conflicts in the medical evidence and these are to be determined by the Secretary. Aldridge v. Celebrezze, 5 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 190. They were determined adversely to appellant.
Finding substantial evidence in the record consistent with the above standard, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
* 1 Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hall v. Richardson, Civ. A. No. 71-H-1342.
...substantial evidence to support the Secretary's decision. Goodman v. Richardson, 448 F.2d 388, 389 (5th Cir. 1971); Richardson v. Richardson, 437 F.2d 109 (5th Cir. 1970); Brown v. Finch, supra, 429 F.2d at 80; Rome v. Finch, 409 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1969). Uncontroverted evidence is not con......
-
Knott v. Califano, 77-1854
...or substitute our judgment for that of the Secretary. Goodman v. Richardson, 5 Cir., 1971, 448 F.2d 388, 389. See Richardson v. Richardson, 5 Cir., 1970, 437 F.2d 109; Cooper v. Finch, 5 Cir., 1970, 433 F.2d 315, 316-17; Brown v. Finch, 5 Cir., 1970, 429 F.2d 80, 82; Rome v. Finch, 5 Cir., ......
-
Williams v. Finch, 29800.
...determination of whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Secretary's decision. See, e. g., Richardson v. Richardson, 5 Cir., 1970, 437 F.2d 109; Cooper v. Finch, 5 Cir., 1970, 433 F.2d 315; Brown v. Finch, 5 Cir., 1970, 429 F.2d 80; Cross v. Finch, 5 Cir., 1970, 4......
-
Taylor v. Richardson
...conflicts in evidence and inferences therefrom which may exist. Brown v. Finch, Finch, 425 F.2d 687 (C.A.5-1970); Richardson v. Richardson, 437 F.2d 109 (C.A.5-1970). It is also settled that the Secretary need not accept self-serving statements of the involved party, particularly where they......