Richardson v. Ross, Civ. No. 2502.
Court | United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina |
Writing for the Court | LARKINS |
Citation | 310 F. Supp. 134 |
Parties | Ollie RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. Mr. Fred R. ROSS, Major of Caledonia Prison Farm, Tillery, North Carolina, Respondent. |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 2502. |
Decision Date | 02 March 1970 |
310 F. Supp. 134
Ollie RICHARDSON, Petitioner,
v.
Mr. Fred R. ROSS, Major of Caledonia Prison Farm, Tillery, North Carolina, Respondent.
Civ. No. 2502.
United States District Court, E. D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division.
March 2, 1970.
Ollie Richardson, pro se.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen. of N. C., by Jacob L. Safron, Staff Atty., Raleigh, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LARKINS, District Judge:
Now comes this cause before the Court as an application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by a State prisoner, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28, United States Code Annotated, Section 2254. Issues have been joined by the Respondent's Answer and Motion to Dismiss.
The Petitioner asserts before this Court that his Constitutional rights have been violated by the State of North Carolina in the following particulars:
(1) In that no indictment existed for the charge of Accessory Before and To the Fact of First Degree Murder upon which his conviction and sentence could rest; and,
(2) In that his plea of guilty to the offense charged was in some way coerced.
The Respondent answers that there has been no denial of Petitioner's rights and prays dismissal of the application.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Twenty-one years ago this month, on March 26, 1949, this Petitioner, while
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Wiggins, 7214SC749
...of the principal crime. State v. Jones, 254 N.C. 450, 119 S.E.2d 213; State v. Bryson, 173 N.C. 803, 92 S.E. 698; Richardson v. Ross, 310 F.Supp. 134 (E.D.N.C.1970); 4 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Indictment and Warrant § 18, p. 368. Consequently, defendant is not entitled to have the charge dism......
-
State v. Sauls, 7518SC1018
...charged in an original indictment is a lesser included offense. State v. Simons, 179 N.C. 700, 103 S.E. 5 (1920); Richardson v. Ross, 310 F.Supp. 134 (E.D.N.C.1970). The State having elected to proceed on the charges of accessory before the fact to the principal charges in the indictment, t......
-
State v. Wiggins, 7214SC749
...of the principal crime. State v. Jones, 254 N.C. 450, 119 S.E.2d 213; State v. Bryson, 173 N.C. 803, 92 S.E. 698; Richardson v. Ross, 310 F.Supp. 134 (E.D.N.C.1970); 4 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Indictment and Warrant § 18, p. 368. Consequently, defendant is not entitled to have the charge dism......
-
State v. Sauls, 7518SC1018
...charged in an original indictment is a lesser included offense. State v. Simons, 179 N.C. 700, 103 S.E. 5 (1920); Richardson v. Ross, 310 F.Supp. 134 (E.D.N.C.1970). The State having elected to proceed on the charges of accessory before the fact to the principal charges in the indictment, t......