Richter v. Bagala, 94-01017
| Citation | 647 So.2d 215 |
| Decision Date | 24 August 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 94-01017,94-01017 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
| Parties | 19 Fla. L. Weekly D1817 Nancy RICHTER and Gary Richter, husband and wife, Petitioners, v. Frank J. BAGALA, M.D., and Rudolph Acosta, M.D., Respondents. |
Kenneth S. Spiegelman of Grover, Ciment, Weinstein, Stauber, Friedman & Ennis, P.A., Miami Beach, for petitioners.
C. Howard Hunter and Sara B. Kehoe of Freeman, Hunter & Malloy, Tampa, for respondent, Frank J. Bagala, M.D.
Philip D. Parrish of Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas, P.A., Miami, for respondent, Rudolph Acosta, M.D.
Nancy Richter and Gary Richter, plaintiffs in a medical malpractice action filed against the respondents, Frank J. Bagala, M.D., and Rudolph Acosta, M.D., seek a writ of certiorari quashing a trial court order allowing ex parte conferences with treating physicians. We grant the petition and issue the writ.
During pretrial proceedings in this matter, Dr. Rudolph Acosta, one of the defendants in the trial court, moved the court for an order approving ex parte conferences between his counsel and the plaintiffs' treating, nonparty, health care providers. Dr. Bagala, the other defendant, joined in the motion. At the conclusion of the hearing on the doctors' motion, the court granted the motion and entered an order allowing their attorneys to have ex parte, general medical discussions with the treating physicians. The order prohibited the attorneys from discussing the specific medical condition of the patient with the doctors. The Richters filed this timely petition seeking a writ of certiorari.
Section 455.241(2), Florida Statutes (1993), provides in pertinent part that medical records:
[M]ay not be furnished to, and the medical condition of a patient may not be discussed with, any person other than the patient or the patient's legal representative or other health care providers involved in the care or treatment of the patient, except upon written authorization of the patient. However, such records may be furnished without written authorization to any person, firm, or corporation which has procured or furnished such examination or treatment with the patient's consent or when compulsory physical examination is made pursuant to Rule 1.360, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, in which case copies of the medical records shall be furnished to both the defendant and the plaintiff. Such records may be furnished in any civil or criminal action, unless otherwise prohibited by law, upon the issuance of a subpoena from a court of competent jurisdiction and proper notice to the patient or the patient's legal representative by the party seeking such records. Except in a medical negligence action when a health care provider is or reasonably expects to be named as a defendant, information disclosed to a health care practitioner by a patient in the course of the care and treatment of such patient is confidential and may be disclosed only to other health care providers involved in the care or treatment of the patient, or if permitted by written authorization from the patient or compelled by subpoena at a deposition, evidentiary hearing, or trial for which proper notice has been given.
In order to obtain an injured plaintiff's medical records from the plaintiff's treating physician, or to discuss the plaintiff's medical condition with him, a person seeking such a disclosure under section 455.241(2) must, absent a waiver, use a statutory method or follow the applicable Florida Rule of Civil Procedure. Johnston v. Donnelly, 581 So.2d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The statute waives confidentiality for the medical condition of a patient or information furnished by the patient to a health care provider when (a) a health care provider is or reasonably expects to be named as a defendant in a medical...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Castillo-Plaza v. Green
...action); Kirkland v. Middleton, 639 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (same), review dismissed, 645 So.2d 453 (Fla.1994); Richter v. Bagala, 647 So.2d 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (same), review granted sub nom. Acosta v. Richter, 650 So.2d 989 (Fla.1995). We hold in this case, however, that the ame......
-
Acosta v. Richter
...of Adorno & Zeder, P.A., Miami, Amicus Curiae for Florida Medical Association. ANSTEAD, Justice. We have for review Richter v. Bagala, 647 So.2d 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), which expressly and directly conflicts with the opinion in Johnson v. Mount Sinai Medical Center, Inc., 615 So.2d 257 (Fla......
- Vincent v. Broward Cty. Florida
-
Pierre By and Through Pierre v. North Shore Medical Center, Inc.
...the opinions in Kirkland v. Middleton, 639 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA), review dismissed, 645 So.2d 453 (Fla.1994), and Richter v. Bagala, 647 So.2d 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), review granted sub nom. Acosta v. Richter, 650 So.2d 989 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. We ha......