Rieffel v. Johnston-Foote
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Citation | Rieffel v. Johnston-Foote, 322 Conn. 904, 138 A.3d 289(Mem) (Conn. 2016) |
| Decision Date | 21 June 2016 |
| Parties | Bich–Ha Henriette RIEFFEL et al. v. Penelope D. JOHNSTON–FOOTE et al. |
Peter M. Ryan, Darien, in support of the petition.
Peter E. DeMartini, Stamford, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 165 Conn.App. 391, 139 A.3d 729 (2016), is denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Preka v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.
... ... is the sole conclusion that a fair and reasonable person ... could reach on the basis of the evidence. Rieffel v ... Johnston-Foote, 165 Conn.App. 391, 404, 139 A.3d 729 ... (citing Miller v. United Technologies Corp., 233 ... Conn. 732, ... ...
-
Preka v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co.
... ... is the sole conclusion that a fair and reasonable person ... could reach on the basis of the evidence. Rieffel v ... Johnston -Foote , 165 Conn.App. 391, 404, 139 A.3d 729 ... (citing Miller v. United Technologies Corp., 233 ... Conn. 732, ... ...
-
Cadle Co. v. Ogalin
...plenary." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Rieffel v. Johnston–Foote , 165 Conn.App. 391, 400, 139 A.3d 729, cert. denied, 322 Conn. 904, 138 A.3d 289 (2016) ; see Capasso v. Christmann , 163 Conn.App. 248, 257, 135 A.3d 733 (2016). Finally, we note that "because any valid special defens......
-
Kazemi v. Allen
...19, 2015) (reprinted at 165 Conn. App. 391, 406–407, 139 A.3d 729 ), aff'd, 165 Conn. App. 391, 139 A.3d 729, cert. denied, 322 Conn. 904, 138 A.3d 289 (2016). "Advice of counsel is a complete defense to an action of ... [vexatious litigation] when it is shown that the [client] ... institut......
Get Started for Free