Rieger v. Rieger

Decision Date03 May 1990
CitationRieger v. Rieger, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613, 161 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
PartiesEllen Lunde RIEGER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Thomas M. RIEGER, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

H.S. Abramson, for plaintiff-respondent.

S. Stein, for defendant-appellant.

Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and MILONAS, KASSAL, WALLACH and SMITH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered January 9, 1989, granting plaintiff-wife a divorce on grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The parties were married on June 23, 1983, and were together for a period of five years before plaintiff-wife commenced this action for divorce, pursuant to DRL § 170(1), on grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. There are no children of the marriage. In appealing the trial court's grant of this relief to plaintiff, defendant-husband argues, inter alia, that plaintiff's proof was insufficient to support a judgment of divorce on that ground. We reject this claim and affirm the judgment in all respects.

Among the trial court's findings of specific acts committed by the defendant, which endangered the plaintiff's well-being and rendered it unsafe and improper for her to cohabit with him, are the following:

1. That during the marriage until June of 1987, the defendant would cease talking to plaintiff for a number of consecutive days, refusing to communicate with her until she apologized to him.

2. That throughout the course of this marriage the defendant repeatedly chastised the plaintiff for failing to do things of trivial or superficial importance, "the right way", which was his way.

3. That throughout the course of this marriage the defendant repeatedly scolded plaintiff for such things as alleged improper handling of a kitchen knife and signing of bank checks.

4. That on or about January 31, 1988, defendant twice stated to plaintiff that they would be better off if she jumped out of the window and committed suicide.

5. That in or about September 1987, defendant chastised and humiliated plaintiff for being "disloyal" because she had not stood up when he arrived at a restaurant to join her and their friends for dinner.

6. That on or about October 8, 1987, defendant accused plaintiff of another act of "disloyalty", namely failing to request that a friend of hers cease talking as they viewed a movie in couple's apartment.

7. That from December 1987 to February 1988, defendant exhibited volatile and irrational mood swings causing plaintiff to be in constant fear of violence.

Plaintiff's testimony with respect to these and related incidents, which caused her great distress,...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Warshaw v. Warshaw
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 8, 1991
    ...that certain conduct constituted cruel and inhuman treatment on this issue will not be lightly set aside on appeal Rieger v. Rieger, 161 A.D.2d 227, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613 and special deference is paid to the trial court's determination of credibility in weighing conflicting testimony (see, Rispo......
  • Reiss v. Reiss
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 19, 1991
    ...v. Brady, 64 N.Y.2d 339, 486 N.Y.S.2d 891, 476 N.E.2d 290; Spinelli v. Spinelli, 160 A.D.2d 992, 554 N.Y.S.2d 713; Rieger v. Rieger, 161 A.D.2d 227, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613; McKilligan v. McKilligan, 156 A.D.2d 904, 550 N.Y.S.2d 121; Weilert v. Weilert, 115 A.D.2d 473, 495 N.Y.S.2d 707). Specifica......
  • Dunne v. Dunne
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 1, 1991
    ...will not be lightly disturbed on appeal (see, Spinelli v. Spinelli, 160 A.D.2d 992, 554 N.Y.S.2d 713; see also, Rieger v. Rieger, 161 A.D.2d 227, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613; Rispoli v. Rispoli, 131 A.D.2d 556, 557, 516 N.Y.S.2d 280). Giving due deference to the trial court's assessment of the credibi......
  • Preston v. Preston
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 1, 1995
    ...be patently unsafe and improper. Gascon v. Gascon, 187 A.D.2d 955, 955, 590 N.Y.S.2d 369 (4th Dep't, 1992); Rieger v. Rieger, 161 A.D.2d 227, 228, 554 N.Y.S.2d 613 (1st Dep't, 1990); LeRuzic v. LeRuzic, 127 A.D.2d 940, 941, 512 N.Y.S.2d 532 (3rd Dep't, Racism is anathema in today's society.......
  • Get Started for Free