Rios v. Field

Decision Date08 March 1971
Docket NumberGen. No. 53972
Citation270 N.E.2d 98,132 Ill.App.2d 519
PartiesRichard RIOS, Plaintiff, v. Laura Willoughby FIELD and Frances Willoughby, Defendants. Frances WILLOUGHBY, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen DEL RIO and George Del Rio, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Clausen, Hirsh, Miller & Gorman, Chicago, James T. Ferrini, Chicago, of counsel, for third party plaintiff-appellant.

Garretson & Santora, Chicago, Melvin A. Garretson, Dom J. Rizzi, Chicago, of counsel, for third party defendants-appellees.

LYONS, Justice.

Richard Rios was injured when the balustrade of a stairway which he was descending collapsed, causing him to fall. He brought an action in the Circuit Court of Cook County against the owners of the building, Laura Willoughby Field and Frances Willoughby. Frances Willoughby, in turn, filed a third party action against Helen and George Del Rio, lessees of the grade level store in the building and employers of Rios. The third party complaint alleged an indemnity agreement and failure of the third party defendants to tender a defense in the original action. The original action was dismissed by stipulation of the parties following a settlement of Rios' claim for $22,000.00, the order of dismissal specifically providing that the third party action was not to be prejudiced by such dismissal. The third party action, submitted to the court sitting without a jury, on the pleadings, exhibits, and a stipulation of facts resulted in a judgment for third party defendants from which third party plaintiff, Willoughby, has appealed.

The building in question, owned by Willoughby, consisted of a grade level store and second floor. Third party defendants leased the grade level store for the purpose of conducting a restaurant and tavern business. Although the lease conveyed only the grade level store, third party defendants were in the habit of storing certain cleaning materials on the second floor landing and also on the second floor. Rios, their employee, was descending an outside wooden stairway with such cleaning materials when the balustrade collapsed, causing him to sustain serious injuries.

In support of her claim for indemnity Willoughby has relied upon Articles twenty-three and twenty-four of the lease agreement which provide:

TWENTY THIRD: Lessee will further carry Liability insurance, other than the aforesaid Dram Shop insurance in the sum of $10,000.00, at lessee's expense and will provide that said Liability insurance will insure both the Lessee and the Lessor, against claims resulting from the use of the premises as Restaurant and Tavern.

TWENTY FOURTH: It is further covenanted and agreed that Lessee shall save harmless and indemnify Lessor against all lawsuits, demands, claims and judgments, liens, costs, and expenses resulting from lessee's transactions of business on the premises as Restaurant and Tavern.

She argues first that Article twenty-four requires the lessees to indemnify her even for injuries caused by her own negligence where such injury 'results' from lessees' transaction of business on the premises and that Rios' use of the stairway in the course of his employment, (lessees having stored cleaning materials on the second floor) was incidental to their transaction of business on the premises.

Willoughby also contends that the third party defendants stand in the relationship of liability insurers with respect to her by reason of their having breached the agreement contained in Article twenty-three. She argues that their failure to have her included as a named insured on the OLT policy which they procured, as required by Article...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Northwest Airlines v. Hughes Air Corp.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • 18 Julio 1985
    ...33 (1960); Bedal v. Hallack and Howard Lumber Co., 226 F.2d 526, 539-40 (9th Cir.1955) (applying Idaho law); Rios v. Field, 132 Ill.App.2d 519, 521-22, 270 N.E.2d 98 (1971); Bartlett v. Davis Corp., 219 Kan. 148, 156-57, 547 P.2d 800 (1976); Blue Grass Restaurant Co. v. Franklin, 424 S.W.2d......
  • Buenz v. Frontline Transp. Co.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • 25 Enero 2008
    ... ... , arising out of or from any accident or other occurrence" to provide indemnification for an indemnitee's own negligence (emphasis omitted)); Rios v. Field, 132 Ill.App.2d 519, 522, 270 N.E.2d 98 (1971) (holding that the use of the phrase "any and all," even if it is "the sole descriptive ... ...
  • Krieger v. Wilson Corp.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 30 Noviembre 2005
    ...to cover damages incurred, and was unambiguous and enforceable (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Rios v. Field, 132 Ill.App.2d 519, 270 N.E.2d 98, 101 (1971) (holding that the phrase "resulting from" in a lease merely requires that the lessee's use of the premises be "the oc......
  • Economy Mechanical Industries, Inc. v. T.J. Higgins Co.
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 19 Diciembre 1997
    ...own negligence. See Ahlvers v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n, 31 Ill.App.3d 166, 171, 334 N.E.2d 329 (1975); Rios v. Field, 132 Ill.App.2d 519, 522, 270 N.E.2d 98 (1971). It is not necessary that there be a specific reference to indemnification for the indemnitee's own negligence. Duffield v. Mar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT