Riscorp, Inc. v. Norman
Decision Date | 17 June 2005 |
Docket Number | 1031946.,1031514. |
Citation | 915 So.2d 1142 |
Parties | RISCORP, INC. v. Peter D. NORMAN, as trustee of the Norman Family Charitable Remainder Unitrust, and Thomas K. Albrecht. Peter D. Norman, as trustee of the Norman Family Charitable Remainder Unitrust, and Thomas K. Albrecht v. Riscorp, Inc. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
W. Stancil Starnes and Bryan O. Balogh of Starnes & Atchison, LLP, Birmingham; and James N. Walter, Jr., and Wyndall A. Ivey of Capell & Howard, P.C., Montgomery, for appellant/cross-appellee Riscorp, Inc.
J. Michael Rediker, Bert S. Nettles, Peter J. Tepley, Michael C. Skotnicki, and Latanishia D. Watters of Haskell Slaughter Young & Rediker, LLC, Birmingham; and Jerry L. Thornton, Hayneville, for appellees/cross-appellants Peter D. Norman, as trustee of the Norman Family Charitable Remainder Unitrust, and Thomas K. Albrecht.
Doy Leale McCall III of Hill, Hill, Carter, Franco, Cole & Black, P.C., Montgomery, for amicus curiae Alabama Defense Lawyers Association, in support of the appellant/cross-appellee Riscorp, Inc.
H. Hampton Boles, Ed R. Haden, and David Burkholder of Balch & Bingham, LLP, Birmingham, for amicus curiae Alabama Bankers Association, in support of the appellant/cross-appellee Riscorp, Inc., on rehearing.
E.J. McArthur, Jr., and Norbert H. Williams, Alabama State Employees Association, Montgomery, for amicus curiae Alabama State Employees Association, in support of the appellees/cross-appellants Peter D. Norman et al., on rehearing.
Riscorp, Inc., appeals, and Peter D. Norman, as trustee of the Norman Family Charitable Remainder Unitrust ("the Trust"), and Thomas K. Albrecht cross-appeal, from a judgment awarding the Trust $1,150,000 compensatory damages and $2,450,000 punitive damages, and awarding Albrecht $62,000 compensatory damages and $540,000 punitive damages, in their action against Riscorp alleging breach of contract and conversion. We reverse and remand in case no. 1031514 and we dismiss the cross-appeal (case no. 1031946).
This is the fourth time this Court has reviewed issues engendered by the interrelated transactions and relationships involved in this case. See Norman v. Occupational Safety Ass'n of Alabama Workmen's Compensation Fund, 811 So.2d 492 (Ala.2001) ("Norman II"); Riscorp v. Occupational Safety Ass'n of Alabama Workmen's Compensation Fund, 796 So.2d 1062 (Ala.2000); and Norman v. Occupational Safety Ass'n of Alabama Workmen's Compensation Fund, 776 So.2d 788 (Ala.2000) ("Norman I"). Much of the background of these transactions and relationships was set forth in Norman II, and we quote from it below, filling in with additional facts when necessary:
811 So.2d at 493-96 (footnotes omitted).
On June 29, 2001, in Norman II, this Court reversed the trial court's...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chism v. Jefferson County
...time in an application for rehearing." (citing Morgan Keegan & Co. v. Cunningham, 918 So.2d 897, 908 (Ala.2005))); Riscorp, Inc. v. Norman, 915 So.2d 1142, 1155 (Ala.2005) (opinion on application for rehearing) ("`The well-settled rule of this Court precludes consideration of arguments made......
-
Thompson v. State
...an application for rehearing.’ (citing Morgan Keegan & Co. v. Cunningham, 918 So. 2d 897, 908 (Ala. 2005) )); Riscorp, Inc. v. Norman, 915 So. 2d 1142, 1155 (Ala. 2005) (opinion on application for rehearing) (‘ "The well-settled rule of this Court precludes consideration of arguments made f......
-
Health Care Auth. for Baptist Health v. Davis, 1090084.
...time in an application for rehearing.’ (citing Morgan Keegan & Co. v. Cunningham, 918 So.2d 897, 908 (Ala.2005) )); Riscorp, Inc. v. Norman, 915 So.2d 1142, 1155 (Ala.2005) (opinion on application for rehearing)(‘ “The well-settled rule of this Court precludes consideration of arguments mad......
-
Southland Health Servs., Inc. v. Bank of Vernon
...or interference with another's property.” SouthTrust Bank v. Donely, 925 So.2d 934, 939 (Ala.2005) (quoting Riscorp, Inc. v. Norman, 915 So.2d 1142, 1152 (Ala.2005)). While conversion has long provided a remedy for the recovery of personal property, its application to money has been “compli......