Risk v. Kansas Trust & Banking Co.
Decision Date | 29 June 1893 |
Citation | 58 F. 45 |
Parties | RISK v. KANSAS TRUST & BANKING CO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Kansas |
H. M Jackson, for petitioner.
David Martin, for receiver.
On March 13, 1893, the complainant in this action obtained a judgment at law against the defendant in this court for about $9,000. This judgment was based on an unsecured debt of the defendant, and the complainant had no beneficial interest in the debenture bonds hereafter mentioned that were issued by the defendant, or in the collaterals pledged for their payment. On the same day, upon motion of complainant, without notice to the secured creditors, and with the consent of the defendant, a receiver of the property of the defendant was appointed. Prior to the commencement of these proceedings the defendant had issued a series of debenture bonds called 'Series A,' in the following form:
The certificate indorsed on the said debenture bonds was in the following form:
This certificate was signed by the president or cashier of the bank. The face value of these outstanding bonds is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carey v. McMillan
... ... Bank, 173 U.S. 131, 19 Sup.Ct. 360, 43 ... L.Ed. 640; Internat. Banking Co. v. Lynch (C.C.A.) ... 269 F. 242; Risk v. Kansas Trust Co. (C.C.) 58 ... ...
-
City of Philadelphia v. Lieberman
...securities lawfully held in trust. In re Voluntary Dissolution Home Provident S. F. Ass'n., 129 N.Y. 288, 29 N.E. 323; Risk v. Kansas Trust & Banking Co., C.C., 58 F. 45; Brackett v. Middlesex Banking Co., 89 Conn. 645, 95 A. 12; Hendrie & B. Bolthoff Mfg. & Supply Co. v. Beck, 72 Colo. 387......
-
National Cash Register Co. v. Burns
...of the default in the deferred payments. York Manufacturing Co. v. Cassell, 201 U.S. 344, 26 S.Ct. 481, 50 L.Ed. 782; Risk v. Kansas Trust & Banking Co., C.C., 58 F. 45; Ardmore Nat. Bank v. Briggs M. & S. Co., 20 427, 94 P. 533, 23 L.R.A.,N.S., 1074, 129 Am.St.Rep. 747 . The appointment of......
-
International Banking Corp. v. Lynch
...its decrees by orders to the defendants. Of course, the adjudication in such a suit does not conclude strangers.' In Risk v. Kansas Trust & Banking Co. (C.C.) 58 F. 45, Judge Sanborn held that the appointment of a receiver of insolvent corporation on the bill of an unsecured creditor does n......