Ritchie v. Kansas
Decision Date | 09 March 1895 |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Parties | HANNAH RITCHIE et al. v. THE KANSAS, NEBRASKA & DAKOTA RAILWAY COMPANY et al |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Error from Shawnee District Court.
THIS action was brought by Hannah Ritchie, Hale Ritchie, and John Ritchie, as heirs at law of John Ritchie, deceased, against The Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Company and the Missouri Pacific Railway Company to recover a part of section 6, township 12, range 16, in Shawnee county. The answer was a general denial. A jury was waived, and the case was tried by the court. At the request of the parties, the conclusions of fact and of law were separately stated, and are very voluminous. It appears that a deed, dated April 7 1886, and acknowledged on the 15th day of the same month, was executed by John Ritchie, and Hannah Ritchie, his wife conveying the lands in controversy to the first-named railway company. The instrument is in form an ordinary warranty deed and recites as the consideration thereof the payment of the sum of $ 1 and other good and valuable considerations. At the same time, as a part of the same transaction, a contract in writing was duly executed and acknowledged by the railway company. The deed and contract were filed for record simultaneously. The following is a copy of the railway company's agreement:
The railroad company took possession of the land under this deed and constructed its railway across it. It also constructed buildings for freight- and passenger-depots, side-tracks and roundhouse, stock-yards and other structures for the accommodation of its business. The railroad and depot buildings were so constructed within one year from the date of the deed and contract. The building designed for a passenger-depot is situated west from the main track, and is surrounded by a platform, the east edge of which is 42 feet from the west rail of the main-track. A platform 95 feet in length and eight feet wide extends along the west side of the track, and is connected with the depot platform by a walk 16 feet wide. The building designed for a freight-depot is located 32 feet west from the passenger-depot. On the 10th of May, 1887, John Ritchie and wife caused a plat of a part of the quarter-section of land in which the tract in controversy was located, belonging to them, to be filed in the office of the register of deeds of Shawnee county, as Ritchie's addition to the city of Topeka. John Ritchie died August 31, 1887. On December 22, 1887, Hale Ritchie and John Ritchie and their wives executed and acknowledged another plat of the same lands for the purpose of making some changes in the former plat. This plat was approved by the mayor and council of the city of Topeka, within which said territory had become included, and was filed for record on January 5, 1888. Both of these plats showed the location of the defendant's railway and side-tracks, and on part of the tract of land conveyed was marked "K. N. & D. depot grounds." The plat also showed the location of the passenger-and freight-depots, the spur-track, roundhouse, and turntable. The Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Company occupied said lands for railroad purposes, and continued to operate its line of railroad from Fort Scott to Topeka until February 23, 1887, when the Missouri Pacific Railway Company took possession and control of its entire line, together with the property in controversy, and all other real and personal property before that time owned and used by the Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Company. Annual passes, issued in the usual form, were given to John Ritchie during his lifetime, and have been also given to Hannah Ritchie. John Ritchie used his pass once on a trip to Fort Scott. Hannah Ritchie never used her pass at all, and returned the passes for 1887, 1888, and 1889. The depot buildings are of a size and character suitable and sufficient for the business of the railroad at that point.
At the time of the construction of the railroad the company purchased a brick building at the corner of Fifth avenue and Adams street in Topeka, about one mile from the land in controversy to which its line of road was constructed, and this building has been used as a passenger-depot ever since. As to the maintenance and use of the depots, the court made the following findings:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Seeck v. Jakel
... ... Springs ... Co., 100 U.S. 55, 25 L.Ed. 547; Martin v. Ohio River ... R. Co., 37 W.Va. 349, 16 S.E. 589; Ritchie v ... Kansas, etc., R. Co., 55 Kan. 36, 39 P. 718; Sioux ... City, etc., Ry. Co. v. Singer, 49 Minn. 301, 51 N.W ... 905, 15 ... ...
-
Pence v. Tidewater Townsite Corp.
...Y. 442; Cornelius v. Ivins, 26 N. J. Law, 376; Bouvier v. Baltimore, etc., R. Co., 65 N. J. Law, 313, 47 Atl. 772; Ritchie v. Kansas, etc., R. Co., 55 Kan. 36, 39 Pac. 718; Sioux City, etc., R. Co. v. Singer, 49 Minn. 301, 51 N. W. 905, 15 L. R. A. 751, 32 Am. St. Rep. 554; Ruddick v. St. L......
-
Stanard v. Sampson
...v. Baker, 2 Kan. App. 600, 42 P. 502; Washington Nat. Bank v. Woodrum, 62 Kan. 867, 62 P. 672. 2. In the case of Ritchie v. K., N. & D. Ry. Co., 55 Kan. 36, 48,39 P. 718, the court said: "All it is necessary to determine in this connection is whether the court may review the conclusions of ......
-
Griswold v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S.S.M. Ry. Co.
... ... land from a railroad company, the same as from an individual, ... and such action is the proper remedy. Ritchie v. Kansas, ... N. & D. Co., 39 P. 718; Lewis v. St. Paul, M. & M ... Ry. Co., 58 N.W. 580 (S. D.); Sherman v. Milw. Lake ... Shore & W. R. R ... ...