Rittenhouse Entm't, Inc. v. City of Wilkes–Barre, Civil Action No. 3:11–CV–617.

CourtUnited States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
Writing for the CourtA. RICHARD CAPUTO
Citation861 F.Supp.2d 470
PartiesRITTENHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; The Mines, Inc.; G Net Comm. Co.; Phoenix Estates; and Thomas J. Greco, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WILKES–BARRE; Thomas Leighton, individually and as Mayor of Wilkes–Barre; Gerald Dessoye, individually and as Chief of Police of Wilkes–Barre; J.J. Murphy, individually and as City Administrator of Wilkes–Barre; Tony Thomas, Jr., Kathy Kane, William Barret, Rick Cronauer, and Michael Merritt, individually and as Members of the Wilkes–Barre City Council; Butch Frati, individually and as Director of Operations of Wilkes–Barre; Luzerne County; Michael Savokinas, individually and as Luzerne County Sheriff; King's College; and Father Thomas J. O'Hara, Robert McGonigle, Paul Lindenmuth, and John McAndrew, individually and as Officers and Employees of Kings College, Defendants.
Decision Date19 March 2012
Docket NumberCivil Action No. 3:11–CV–617.

861 F.Supp.2d 470

RITTENHOUSE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; The Mines, Inc.; G Net Comm. Co.; Phoenix Estates; and Thomas J. Greco, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF WILKES–BARRE; Thomas Leighton, individually and as Mayor of Wilkes–Barre; Gerald Dessoye, individually and as Chief of Police of Wilkes–Barre; J.J. Murphy, individually and as City Administrator of Wilkes–Barre; Tony Thomas, Jr., Kathy Kane, William Barret, Rick Cronauer, and Michael Merritt, individually and as Members of the Wilkes–Barre City Council; Butch Frati, individually and as Director of Operations of Wilkes–Barre; Luzerne County; Michael Savokinas, individually and as Luzerne County Sheriff; King's College; and Father Thomas J. O'Hara, Robert McGonigle, Paul Lindenmuth, and John McAndrew, individually and as Officers and Employees of Kings College, Defendants.

Civil Action No. 3:11–CV–617.

United States District Court,
M.D. Pennsylvania.

March 19, 2012.


[861 F.Supp.2d 475]


Harry Kresky, New York, NY, Howard A. Rothenberg, Herlands Rothenberg & Levine, Scranton, PA, for Plaintiffs.

Donald H. Brobst, Thomas J. Campenni, Rosenn Jenkins & Greenwald, John G. Dean, Elliott Greenleaf & Dean, Wilkes–Barre, PA, Deborah H. Simon, Elliott, Greenleaf & Siedzikowski, Blue Bell, PA, David L. Schwalm, Thomas, Thomas & Hafer, L.L.P., Harrisburg, PA, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM

A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this suit alleging violations of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and Pennsylvania law, as well as several state tort claims. Three sets of Defendants move to dismiss: the “City Defendants” (the City of Wilkes–Barre, Thomas Leighton, Gerald Dessoye, J.J. Murphy, Tony Thomas Jr., Kathy Kane, William Barrett, Rick Cronauer, Michael Merritt, and Butch Frati); the “College Defendants” (King's College, Father Thomas O'Hara, Robert McGonigle, Paul Lindenmuth, and John McAndrew); and the “County Defendants” (Luzerne County and Michael Savokinas). Because Plaintiffs fail to properly state several claims, Defendants' motions will be granted in part. But because Plaintiffs have properly pleaded other claims, Defendants' motions will be denied in part.

I. Background

The facts as alleged in the Plaintiffs' complaint are as follows:

A. The Mines Nightclub

Plaintiff Thomas Greco is an officer, director, and principal of two of the Plaintiff Corporations: The Mines, Inc. and Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. (collectively, the “Entertainment Corporations”). Mr. Greco and the Entertainment Corporations own and operate a nightclub and bar called The Mines, located across the street from Defendant King's College in Wilkes–Barre, Pennsylvania. Mr. Greco owns the real property where The Mines is located. Mr. Greco and the Entertainment Corporations invested over $900,000 in the development of The Mines.

In early 2009, The Mines was open from Thursday through Saturday evenings from 5:00 p.m. until 2:00 a.m. The nightclub's patrons were 30–40% black and Latino,

[861 F.Supp.2d 476]

including minority students from King's College. The Mines enforced a strict dress code and identification policy, and it used metal detectors and an identification scanner with digital back-up. It had an extremely limited number of disturbances-fewer than typical for a nightclub.

B. Concern from the City of Wilkes–Barre and King's College

At the beginning of January, 2009, Defendants the City of Wilkes–Barre, its Mayor Thomas Leighton, its Chief of Police Gerald Dessoye, and its City Administrator J.J. Murphy all faced increasing public criticism and scrutiny. There had been an upsurge in violent crimes, and the public was concerned that these Defendants were failing to provide adequate law enforcement.

Mr. Murphy and Chief Dessoye suggested that Mr. Greco speak with Chief Dessoye about The Mines. During that conversation, Chief Dessoye stated that The Mines was not a “good mix” with King's College and that it attracted “the wrong crowd.” Mr. Greco advised the Chief that recent criminal incidents near the college did not involve nightclub customers, were near other bars in the area, or occurred on nights when the nightclub was closed.

Defendant Robert McGonigle, the Associate Vice President for Student Affairs at King's College, with the assistance of Defendant John McAndrew, the college's Dean of Students, sent an e-mail to the students at King's College on about April 5, 2009. The email alleged that there were problems with the Mines and invited students to a forum to discuss how to file complaints with the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (“PLCB”) against the nightclub. On about April 8, 2009, Mr. Greco met with Defendant Father Thomas J. O'Hara, who is President of King's College, and other King's College staff. Father O'Hara advised Mr. Greco that he was under pressure from parents of students at King's College who were threatening to remove their students from the college unless there was action taken against the Mines or it was shut down. Father O'Hara also said that the clientele at The Mines was not a “good mix” with the college and that the nightclub attracted “the wrong crowd.” Defendant Paul Lindenmuth, the Chair of the Department of Criminal Justice and Sociology at King's College, falsely told students and staff that there had been drug busts at The Mines and that the nightclub had lost its licenses.

C. The Campaign of Harassment

Starting on about April 16, 2009, the City of Wilkes–Barre and Luzerne County began a campaign of harassment against the black and Latino patrons of The Mines. The College Defendants acted in concert with the City and County in order to shut down The Mines and cause damage to Mr. Greco and the Entertainment Corporations. The City began the harassment by creating and embellishing police reports to make it appear as if criminal incidents were occurring on Mr. Greco's nightclub property. After the harassment began, Father O'Hara told Mr. Greco that King's College would try to shut down The Mines because it had “the wrong crowd.” Father O'Hara then met with Mayor Leighton and Chief Dessoye to discuss The Mines.

The following weekend, on about April 23, 2009, six police cruisers and fifteen policemen (including a K–9 drug dog) stationed themselves at the nightclub property for hours. The officers stood in the driveways of the nightclub's parking lots and down the block from the nightclub, harassing and arresting people who attempted to enter The Mines. They conducted breathalizer blood alcohol tests of patrons leaving The Mines and had the

[861 F.Supp.2d 477]

drug dog approach people coming or going from the nightclub. In one instance, the police beat up a patron. The police told the nightclub's manager, “We are closing your boss's place down.”

The harassment escalated a week later around April 30, 2009. There were thirty law enforcement officers outside The Mines. This included Defendant Luzerne County Sheriff Michael Savokinas, eight Sheriff's deputies from Defendant Luzerne County, four vehicles, three Pennsylvania State Liquor Control Enforcement agents, a Wilkes–Barre SWAT team, eight Wilkes–Barre police vehicles, a motorcycle police officer, and two K–9 dogs. The officers did not arrest anyone or issue any citations. The law enforcement presence was merely for the purposes of targeting and harassing Mr. Greco, the Entertainment Corporations, and prospective patrons of The Mines. Then on about May 15 and 16, 2009, Wilkes–Barre police set up seatbelt check points in front of The Mines for two nights.

Prior to this police harassment, the Mines had never received a citation from the PLCB or had any legal or law enforcement action against it. Other bars in the area whose patrons were 95–99% white had numerous incidents of crime, violence, noise, PLCB citations, and liquor license removals. The City and its police did not undertake similar law enforcement actions against the bars with predominantly white clientele.

All this police activity was pursuant to a custom or policy of the City and the County to discourage businesses in Wilkes–Barre and Luzerne County from serving black and Latino patrons, to use those businesses as scapegoats for the City's and County's law enforcement failures, and to prevent black and Latino people from living in or spending time in the City and the County. The City has previously taken action to close down several other bars and restaurants that served black and Latino clientele.

Because of the police crackdown, there was a decline in business at the Mines. Currently, the nightclub opens approximately once every ten days in order to maintain its liquor license. Mr. Greco and the Entertainment Corporations have lost significant income and income prospects. Mr. Greco has also suffered damage to his reputation.

D. Felony Charges Against Mr. Greco

Mayor Leighton and Chief Dessoye induced FBI Agent Joseph Noone to manipulate Mr. Greco into becoming vulnerable to the charge of misprision. Mayor Leighton and Chief Dessoye were friends of Agent Noone and like him, were alumni of King's College. They acted in retaliation against Mr. Greco for threatening a civil rights lawsuit against the City based on the police harassment at The Mines. As a result of Agent Noone's efforts, Mr. Greco pled guilty to misprision on about November 10, 2010. He was sentenced to two years probation and fifty hours of community service and was fined $10,000.

E. Denial of Tax Benefits

Mr. Greco is also a principal of the two other Plaintiff corporations: G Net Comm. Co. and Phoenix Estates (the “Development Corporations”). G Net and Phoenix own real estate in the City of Wilkes–Barre. The City and Mayor Leighton had been considering providing tax and other benefits to the Development Corporations as part of the Keystone Opportunity Zone (“KOZ”) program.

Mr. Greco, G Net, and Phoenix invested over $2,900,000 to develop the companies' properties as an advanced broadband economic development project and community green energy geothermal district heating and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
32 practice notes
  • Adams v. Luzerne Cnty., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-01102
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 6 Agosto 2014
    ...County qualifies as a local agency under the PPSTCA. 42 Pa.C.S. § 8501; Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Wilkes-Barre, 861 F. Supp. 2d 470, 489 (M.D. Pa. 2012). As such, Luzerne County has immunity under the statute and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' defamation claims a......
  • Adams v. Luzerne Cnty., Civil Action No. 3:13–CV–01102.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 6 Agosto 2014
    ...County qualifies as a local agency under the PPSTCA. 42 Pa.C.S. § 8501 ; Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Wilkes–Barre, 861 F.Supp.2d 470, 489 (M.D.Pa.2012). As such, Luzerne County has immunity under the statute and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' defamation claims agai......
  • Adams v. Luzerne Cnty., Civil Action No. 3:13–CV–01102.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 6 Agosto 2014
    ...County qualifies as a local agency under the PPSTCA. 42 Pa.C.S. § 8501; Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Wilkes–Barre, 861 F.Supp.2d 470, 489 (M.D.Pa.2012). As such, Luzerne County has immunity under the statute and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' defamation claims again......
  • Snyder v. Daugherty, Civil Action No. 2:11–cv–00879.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • 28 Septiembre 2012
    ...government, and the Defendants in this case are state governmental officials. Rittenhouse Entertm't, Inc. v. City of Wilkes–Barre, 861 F.Supp.2d 470, 485–86 (M.D.Pa.2012) (citing B & G Const. Co., Inc. v. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs, 662 F.3d 233, 246 n. 14 (3d Cir.2011)). Fourt......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
32 cases
  • Adams v. Luzerne Cnty., CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-01102
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 6 Agosto 2014
    ...County qualifies as a local agency under the PPSTCA. 42 Pa.C.S. § 8501; Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Wilkes-Barre, 861 F. Supp. 2d 470, 489 (M.D. Pa. 2012). As such, Luzerne County has immunity under the statute and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' defamation claims a......
  • Adams v. Luzerne Cnty., Civil Action No. 3:13–CV–01102.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 6 Agosto 2014
    ...County qualifies as a local agency under the PPSTCA. 42 Pa.C.S. § 8501 ; Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Wilkes–Barre, 861 F.Supp.2d 470, 489 (M.D.Pa.2012). As such, Luzerne County has immunity under the statute and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' defamation claims agai......
  • Adams v. Luzerne Cnty., Civil Action No. 3:13–CV–01102.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • 6 Agosto 2014
    ...County qualifies as a local agency under the PPSTCA. 42 Pa.C.S. § 8501; Rittenhouse Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Wilkes–Barre, 861 F.Supp.2d 470, 489 (M.D.Pa.2012). As such, Luzerne County has immunity under the statute and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' defamation claims again......
  • Associated Builders & Contractors, E. Pa. Chapter, Inc. v. Cnty. of Northampton, CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-2552
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • 25 Abril 2019
    ...of fact that cannot be resolved at the motion to dismiss stage." Id. at *5 (citing Rittenhouse Entm't, Inc. v. City of Wilkes-Barre , 861 F.Supp.2d 470, 481 (M.D. Pa. 2012). Even if limited to the class of one context, that language is inconsistent with Third Circuit precedent. See, e.g. , ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT