Rivera-Lopez v. Municipality of Dorado
Decision Date | 09 September 1992 |
Docket Number | RIVERA-LOPEZ,No. 92-1226,92-1226 |
Citation | 979 F.2d 885 |
Parties | Raymond, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. MUNICIPALITY OF DORADO, Defendant, Appellant. First Circuit. Heard |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit |
Carlos Lugo Fiol, Asst. Sol. Gen., with whom Anabelle Rodriguez, Sol. Gen., and Reina Colan de Rodriguez, Deputy Sol. Gen., were on brief for defendant, appellant.
Arnaldo E. Granados with whom Ortiz Toro & Ortiz Brunet was on brief for plaintiffs, appellees.
Before BREYER, Chief Judge, ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Raymond Rivera Lopez, et al. brought this diversity tort action in the Puerto Rico District Court against the Municipality of Dorado by a complaint filed on October 18, 1990. The summons was allegedly served on one Jesus E. Palmer, Esquire, an attorney employed part-time by defendant. The local rule, adopted by the federal rule, provides for service upon the "chief executive [or] a person designated by him." Puerto Rico R.Civ.P. 4.4(h); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(6). Defendant failed to appear and, in due course, was defaulted. Thereafter, without any attempt having been made to notify defendant, a jury trial was held to determine damages. The jury having found $300,000, judgment was entered accordingly for plaintiffs, but, within 10 days, defendant appeared specially and moved to remove the default and to vacate the judgment. Affidavits were submitted, hereinafter described.
Defendant's motion was referred to a magistrate judge who, according to plaintiffs' brief, "had the discretion and opportunity to consider the credibility of the testimonies that the court had before it." This is not, however, what he did. Rather, recognizing that both the mayor and attorney Palmer had filed affidavits to the effect that Palmer lacked authority to receive service--Palmer adding that he had so informed the process server--the magistrate invoked, instead, the doctrine of estoppel. On three previous occasions defendant had not complained of service that had been made on persons other than the mayor. 1 Relying on this showing, the magistrate said,
This was a grossly enlarged view. A party claiming estoppel must show reliance, to his detriment, on a misrepresentation of facts. See Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford City, Inc., 467 U.S. 51, 59, 104 S.Ct. 2218, 2223, 81 L.Ed.2d 42 (1984); K-Mart Corp. v. Oriental Plaza, Inc., 875 F.2d 907, 912 (1st Cir.1989). There was no testimony that either plaintiffs or the process server relied on, or even knew of, the previous occurrences on which the magistrate predicated estoppel. While, as the magistrate said, estoppel is based on fairness, plaintiffs cannot claim unfairness by reason of something of which they were ignorant.
We would add that this is not an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Estates of Ungar ex rel. Strachman v. Palestinian
...Federal Practice and Procedure § 1353 (2d ed.1987). Plaintiffs bear the burden of proving proper service. Rivera-Lopez v. Municipality of Dorado, 979 F.2d 885, 887 (1st Cir.1992). In the instant case, the PA defendants have not articulated any objection to the mode of delivery of the summon......
-
Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.
...105, 111 (1st Cir. 2008) ("once challenged, plaintiffs have the burden of proving proper service") (quoting Rivera-Lopez v. Municipality of Dorado , 979 F.2d 885, 887 (1st Cir. 1992) (internal citations omitted).D. FED R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) requires plaint......
-
Bell v. Rinchem Co.
...a defendant challenges service under Rule 12(b)(5), the plaintiff has the burden of proving proper service. Rivera-Lopez v. Municipality of Dorado, 979 F.2d 885, 887 (1st Cir. 1992) (citing cases). If proper service has not been made, the court "must dismiss the action without prejudice aga......
-
Taite v. Bridgewater State Univ.
...§ 12.33[1] (3d ed.2013). Once challenged, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to prove proper service. Rivera–Lopez v. Municipality of Dorado , 979 F.2d 885, 887 (1st Cir. 1992).The docket reflects that a summons was executed as to DeBobes on March 11, 2016. (Dkt. No. 8). The accompanying "P......