Rivera v. City of New York
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Citation | Rivera v. City of New York, 344 N.Y.S.2d 364, 32 N.Y.2d 726 (N.Y. 1973) |
| Decision Date | 25 April 1973 |
| Parties | , 297 N.E.2d 99 Ernesto RIVERA, an infant, by his father and natural guardian, Thomas Rivera, and Thomas Rivera, Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. |
Order, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, affirmed, without costs. No opinion.
All concur.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
Muallem v. City of New York
...bicyclist's complaint against the city. Thereafter, in Rivera v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, affd. 32 N.Y.2d 726, 344 N.Y.S.2d 364, 297 N.E.2d 99 we again affirmed the dismissal of an infant bicyclist's complaint against the city. And, finally, in Olsen v. City of New......
-
Muallem v. City of New York
... ... Relying on a series of Appellate Division cases from this Department, the City contends that it "owed no duty to maintain its sidewalks and walkways in a condition reasonably safe for infant bicyclists" (Olsen v. City of New York, 49 A.D.2d 884, 885, 373 N.Y.S.2d 214, 214; Rivera v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, affd. 32 N.Y.2d 726, 344 N.Y.S.2d 364, 297 N.E.2d 99; Roberto v. City of New York, 35 A.D.2d 782, 315 N.Y.S.2d 819 (all Second Department cases)) ... While the City has accurately reflected the case law on this subject, an ... ...
-
Cygielman v. City of New York
...a large hole on the sidewalk was also dismissed in Rivera v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, affd. 32 N.Y.2d 726, 344 N.Y.S.2d 364, 297 N.E.2d 99. Plaintiff contends that Levy, Rivera and Roberto must be viewed in the context of section 1907 of the Penal Law, which was in......
-
Errante v. City of New York
... ... However, it is the City's contention that it owes no duty to maintain its sidewalks in perfect condition or in such a condition as would be safe for unusual and extraordinary uses. The City claims that roller skating is such an extraordinary use ... In Rivera v. City of New York, 39 A.D.2d 606, 331 N.Y.S.2d 784, aff'd 32 N.Y.2d 726, 344 N.Y.S.2d 364, 297 N.E.2d 99, an infant was injured in a fall while riding a bicycle on a public sidewalk when its front wheel struck a hole near the curb. In that case, the court held that a municipality was bound only ... ...
Get Started for Free