Rives v. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia
Decision Date | 28 November 1903 |
Citation | 77 S.W. 424 |
Parties | RIVES v. FIRE ASS'N OF PHILADELPHIA.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Marion County; J. M. Talbot, Judge.
Suit by Herbert Rives against the Fire Association of Philadelphia. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed, and motion for rehearing overruled.
W. T. Armistead and F. H. Prendergast, for appellant. Finley & Knight and Crane, Greer & Wharton, for appellee.
H. Rives, as plaintiff, instituted this suit against the Fire Association of Philadelphia in the district court on May 27, 1902, to recover judgment on a fire insurance policy for $1,500. A trial was had, and the court instructed a verdict for defendant. Judgment was accordingly so entered, and plaintiff appealed.
On the 27th day of December, 1901, the Fire Association of Philadelphia issued to H. Rives its policy of insurance for the sum of $1,500, by which it insured against direct loss or damage by fire cotton in bales owned or held by the said Herbert Rives, in trust or on commission, or on joint account with others, while contained in the warehouse at 107-108, Block 17, Soda street, Jefferson, Tex. On February 13, 1902, while said policy was in force, 327 bales of cotton contained in said warehouse were destroyed by fire. Seventy-six bales were held on joint account for D. C. Wise and Rives, the appellant. Ten bales were held on joint account for Rives & Sherrill. Fourteen bales were held on joint account for Rives & Hudson. One hundred and eighteen bales were held on joint account for Rives & Segal. One hundred and nine bales held in trust for other parties, whose names are set out in the petition. The policy contained the following provision:
The defendant, in its answer, set up this provision of the policy, and alleged the failure on the part of the assured to comply therewith, and that On the issue thus presented, the plaintiff testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arkansas Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Woolverton
...where there has been no compliance, or where there has been a clear case of negligence on the part of the insured. 25 Tex. Civ. App. 518; 77 S.W. 424. See also 19 Civ. App. 338. The iron-safe clause is a part of the policy; and while it refers only to the inventory, the policy itself stipul......
-
Capital Fire Insurance Company v. Kaufman
...and invoices were not preserved in accordance with the contract. It was error to admit estimates of the amount of stock on hand. 65 Ark. 240, 249-50. 2. it was reasonable for appellee to have his books upstairs at the time of the fire, which is not conceded, it was manifestly unnecessary to......
-
Beauchamp v. Retail Merchants Association
... ... 483 J. B. BEAUCHAMP v. RETAIL MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, Mutual Fire" Insurance Company Supreme Court of North Dakota October 20, 1917 ... \xC2" ... 115, 81 ... S.W. 705, reversing Tex. Civ. App. , 78 S.W. 378; Rives ... v. Fire Asso. of Philadelphia, Tex. Civ. App. , 77 S.W ... 424; ... ...
-
æ v. Lipsitz
...Ellington, 94 Ga. 785, 21 S. E. 1006; Ætna Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 127 Ga. 491, 56 S. E. 643, 9 L. R. A. (N. S.) 667; Rives v. Fire Ass'n of Phila. (Tex. Civ. App.) 77 S. W. 424; Morris v. Imperial Ins. Co., 106 Ga. 465-467, 32 S. E. ...