RL Witters Associates v. Ebsary Gypsum Co.
Decision Date | 05 January 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 8596.,8596. |
Parties | R. L. WITTERS ASSOCIATES, Inc., v. EBSARY GYPSUM CO., Inc., et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Leland Hyzer, of Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Herbert U. Feibelman and W. G. Ward, both of Miami, Fla., for appellees.
Before FOSTER, SIBLEY, and HUTCHESON, Circuit Judges.
Appellant, a petitioner for corporate reorganization under section 77B (a)1 of the National Bankruptcy Act, filed its petition in the form, and with the allegations, required by the section. The District Judge approved the petition, continued the debtor temporarily in possession, and directed that a hearing be had as to whether a trustee should be appointed. Appellees are creditors who, before the filing of the reorganization petition, had instituted involuntary proceedings in bankruptcy against petitioner. They appeared in the proceeding to controvert the facts alleged in the petition, particularly that the petition was filed in good faith.
The principal points of attack upon the good faith of the petitioner are that it made a conveyance some six months before, which has operated to hinder, delay, and defraud its creditors; that it is not a going concern and cannot be made one; and that the reorganization petition was filed not in good faith to obtain the benefits of the act, but in bad faith, for the purpose of coercing creditors to accept an unconscionable settlement. There was a hearing, at the end of which the District Judge found that the petition had not been filed in good faith. He filed findings of fact and conclusions of law of which these are the gist:
Based upon these views, he concluded that there was absent from the filing the "legal good faith the statute requires."
Appellant insists that the District Judge gave too narrow a construction to the statutory words "good faith"; that he gave them a meaning not intended by the lawmakers, and neither expressed nor implicit in the words. It insists that this ruling would exclude from the operation of the statute all corporations except those which are to be reorganized as going concerns; that specifically it would exclude corporations seeking an orderly and conserving liquidation as against the disrupting and dismembering processes of common-law actions and seizures.
We agree with appellant. The statute as to the corporations eligible to file the petition is broad and comprehensive. Under it, "Any corporation which could become a bankrupt * * * may file an original petition." Nowhere in the statute is there any definition of "good faith." What is meant by the term must be drawn from the meaning of the words themselves, as interpreted by the context in which they are used, the purpose back of the statute, the mischiefs it was enacted to prevent, the results it was enacted to accomplish.
The provisions of section 77B (a) pertinent to this appeal are:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Victory Const. Co., Inc.
...827 (4th Cir. 1937). u. No reasonable possibility the debtor can conform to or obtain benefit of the statute: R.L. Witters Assocs. v. Ebsary Gypsum Co., 93 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1938); Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Co., 97 F.2d 237 (8th Cir. 1938). v. Liquidation more advantageous to creditor......
-
De Cano v. State, 28101.
... ... 18, 57 S.Ct. 85, 81 L.Ed ... 13; R. L. Witters Associates, Inc., v. Ebsary Gypsum Co., ... 5 Cir., 93 F.2d 746; ... ...
-
In re Fidelity Assur. Ass'n
...conform to and obtain the benefits of the statute for a slow, beneficial and orderly liquidation. R. L. Witters Associates, Inc., v. Ebsary Gypsum Co., Inc., et al., 5 Cir., 1938, 93 F.2d 746; In re Central Funding Corporation, 2 Cir., 1935, 75 F.2d 256; In re Mortgage Securities Corporatio......
-
In re Metropolitan Realty Corporation
...contends that the summary action of the district court directly conflicts with this Court's decision in R. L. Witters Associates, Inc. v. Ebsary Gypsum Co., 5 Cir. 1938, 93 F.2d 746. In that case Judge Hutcheson wrote if it is clear that under no reasonable possibility can the debtor confor......
-
The Objective and Jurisdictional Origins of Chapter 11's Good Faith Filing Requirement.
...the plan stage is reached, as wanting in the good faith the statute requires.") (quoting R. L. Witters Associates v. Ebsary Gypsum Co., 93 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1938)); In re Liberty Mortg. Corp., 245 F. Supp. 858, 864 (N.D. Ohio 1965) ("it is unreasonable to expect that a plan of reorganizati......