Roach v. State, 70--408

Decision Date08 December 1970
Docket NumberNo. 70--408,70--408
Citation241 So.2d 742
PartiesHerman ROACH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C.J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant in this case was charged by information with assault with intent to commit murder and the separate offense of improper exhibition of a firearm. He was tried by jury. Before the case went to the jury the court withdrew the second charge and granted acquittal thereof, and reduced the first charge to aggravated assault, of which offense the jury found the defendant guilty. His appeal from the judgment thereon challenges only the refusal of the court to grant a mistrial when the assistant state attorney, in closing argument, made reference to the fact that as a convicted felon he was not even entitled to possess a firearm. No error was committed in denying the motion for mistrial, because in the course of the trial while the defendant was testifying, the fact that he had been convicted of a felony was properly revealed.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Johnson v. State, 86-1889
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 10, 1987
    ...3d DCA), cert. denied, 278 So.2d 627 (Fla.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1157, 94 S.Ct. 914, 39 L.Ed.2d 109 (1974); Roach v. State, 241 So.2d 742, 742 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). This latter factor distinguishes this case, in our view, from Lane v. State, 459 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) and Baysho......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT