Roberson v. Roberson, 7 Div. 774

Decision Date27 March 1969
Docket Number7 Div. 774
Citation221 So.2d 122,284 Ala. 5
PartiesNancy ROBERSON v. Gloria ROBERSON et al.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Bell & Lang, Sylacauga, for appellant.

H. R. Burnham, of Burnham, Klinefelter & Halsey, Anniston, for appellees.

SIMPSON, Justice.

This is a case involving a guardianship. James Russell Roberson, II was born on June 27, 1908, and was under the care and custody of his father, J. F. Roberson, until the death of his father on February 2, 1966. On February 15, 1966, Nancy Roberson, the appellant in this case, filed a petition in the Probate Court of St. Clair County seeking appointment as guardian for her brother, James Russell Roberson, II. A hearing was held on this petition on February 23, 1966, resulting in a jury verdict, decree and letters of guardianship issued to the appellant.

Thereafter on August 25, 1966 Gloria Roberson, sister-in-law of James Russell Roberson, II, filed a petition in the Probate Court of St. Clair County as next friend of James Roberson, II seeking revocation of the letters of guardianship because there was no sufficient evidence to sustain the decree. Thereafter the petition filed by the appellee was amended to allege that the mental status of the ward had changed since the granting of the letters of guardianship.

The Probate Court in which this petition was filed ordered an examination by a medical doctor made of James Russell Roberson, II, set the matter down for hearing, summoned a jury, and appointed a guardian ad litem. Testimony on this petition was taken before a jury which returned a verdict that there had been a change in the mental condition of James Russell since February 23, 1966, the date of the granting of the letters of guardianship, and that he was a person of sound mind. An order was entered by the court revoking the letters of guardianship.

Thereafter the appellant took an appeal from the decree rendered by the Probate Court to the Circuit Court of St. Clair County which entered an order affirming the decree of the Probate Court. This appeal is from that order of the Circuit Court, affirming the judgment entered in the Probate Court.

The only assignment of error argued by the appellant in brief is that the Circuit Court erred in affirming the decree of the Probate Court in that such decree, based upon a jury verdict, is contrary to the evidence.

Essentially then the appellant is arguing that the decree of the Probate Court should have been set aside because the jury verdict is contrary to the evidence. There is no merit to this...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Nigg v. Smith
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • February 27, 1981
    ...relatives who had not seen appellant on a regular basis for several years. In any event, as this Court stated in Roberson v. Roberson, 284 Ala. 5, 6, 221 So.2d 122 (1969): No rule of law is more firmly established by our decisions than where there is a conflict in the evidence the jury shou......
  • Merchants Bank v. Cotton
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1972
    ...court cannot take such question from the jury. Tobler v. Pioneer Mining and Manufacturing Co., 166 Ala. 482, 52 So. 86; Roberson v. Roberson, 284 Ala. 5, 221 So.2d 122. Appellant's assignments of error numbered 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12 and 13 concern the trial court's refusal to give certain a......
  • Campbell v. Regal Typewriter Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • July 12, 1973
    ...the truth of a disputed fact.' Tobler v. Pioneer Mining and Manufacturing Company, 166 Ala. 482, 52 So. 86 (1909).' Roberson v. Roberson, 284 Ala. 5, 6, 221 So.2d 122, 124. 'In civil cases, the question must go to the jury if the evidence or the reasonable inferences arising therefrom furni......
  • Adams v. Adams
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • September 4, 1975
    ...of the evidence is in conflict. The case was properly submitted to the jury. The jury's verdict is presumed correct. Roberson v. Roberson, 284 Ala. 5, 221 So.2d 122 (1969). It is the jury's province to decide from the evidence the truth of a disputed In view of the result we reach, we need ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Alabama's Appellate Standards of Review in Civil Cases
    • United States
    • Alabama State Bar Alabama Lawyer No. 81-1, January 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...before it. See Vise v. Cole Sanitation, Inc., 591 So. 2d 32 (Ala. 1991)." McCallie, 660 So. 2d at 585, n. 1. See also Roberson v. Roberson, 284 Ala. 5, 221 So. 2d 122 (1969) (on appeal from circuit court order affirming probate court decree revoking appointment of guardian following jury tr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT