Roberson v. State

Decision Date30 June 1909
CitationRoberson v. State, 162 Ala. 30, 50 So. 345 (Ala. 1909)
PartiesROBERSON v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Houston County; H. A. Pearce, Judge.

Cleve Roberson was convicted of murder in the second degree, and he appeals.Affirmed.

The following charges were requested by and refused to the defendant: "(1) In determining what weight or credit, if any, you will give to the testimony of Lulu Ward, you may consider the fact, if it be a fact, along with all the other evidence, that she was the mother of the deceased, Foy Ward.(2)The court charges the jury that, in connection with the other evidence in the case, you may consider the fact that Lulu Ward was the mother of deceased, and may believe from the evidence, or from your own knowledge and experience as applied to the evidence, that she entertained that degree of affection and parental love that is common to her race."

Alexander M. Garber, Atty. Gen., for the State.

MAYFIELD J.

The defendant was indicted of murder in the first degree, and was convicted and sentenced for murder in the second degree.The special venire for the trial was drawn on Saturday, and the trial was set for the following Tuesday.All the orders of the court for the trial and venire appear to be regular.The sheriff served a copy of the venire on the defendantat 7 o'clock on the evening it was drawn, but no copy of the indictment at that time; but on Sunday he did serve the defendant with a copy of the indictment.This was a sufficient compliance with the statute(section 7840 of the Code of 1907) as to the service of a copy of the indictment and venire for the trial to be had on Tuesday following.The two copies need not be made or served at the same time.Barnett's Case, 83 Ala. 40, 3 So. 612.The service of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
86 cases
  • Petersen v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 11 Enero 2019
    ...Kelly v. State, 273 Ala. 240, 244, 139 So. 2d 326 (1962).... A verdict on conflicting evidence is conclusive on appeal. Roberson v. State, 162 Ala. 30, 50 So. 345 (1909). "[W]here there is ample evidence offered by the state to support a verdict, it should not be overturned even though the ......
  • Sheffield v. State Of Ala.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 5 Noviembre 2010
    ...Kelly v. State, 273 Ala. 240, 244, 139 So. 2d 326 (1962).... A verdict on conflicting evidence is conclusive on appeal. Roberson v. State, 162 Ala. 30, 50 So. 345 (1909). "[W]here there is ample evidence offered by the state to support a verdict, it should not be overturned even though the ......
  • Debardelaben v. Price
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Alabama
    • 26 Febrero 2015
    ...Kelly v. State, 273 Ala. 240, 244, 139 So.2d 326 (1962).... A verdict on conflicting evidence is conclusive on appeal. Roberson v. State, 162 Ala. 30, 50 So. 345 (1909). "[W]here there is ample evidence offered by the state to support a verdict, it should not be overturned even though the e......
  • Parsons v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 23 Diciembre 1948
    ...218 Ala. 527(9), 119 So. 215. But it is not reversible error to refuse such a charge since it would be argumentative. Robertson v. State, 162 Ala. 30, 50 So. 345; Mitchell v. State, 133 Ala. 65, 32 So. 132; v. State, 102 Ala. 144(8), 15 So. 278; Sanderson v. State, 236 Ala. 27, 181 So. 508.......
  • Get Started for Free