Roberson v. State

CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtJORDAN; TOWNSEND, P. J., and FRANKUM
CitationRoberson v. State, 121 S.E.2d 710, 104 Ga.App. 382 (Ga. App. 1961)
Decision Date15 September 1961
Docket NumberNo. 1,No. 39002,39002,1
PartiesCecil ROBERSON v. STATE

Hamilton & Anderson, George Anderson, Rome, for plaintiff in error.

Chastine Parker, Solicitor, Rome, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court.

JORDAN, Judge.

Cecil Roberson was tried and convicted in the City Court of Floyd County for the offense of stabbing. His amended motion for new trial was denied and he excepted to that judgment. Held:

'Unless there be great superiority in physical strength of an assailant who strikes another a blow with his fist, or ill health in the assailed at the time, or other circumstance producing relatively great inequality between them in combat, the assailed cannot justifiably resent the blow by stabbing the assailant.' Morgan v. State, 119 Ga. 566(3), 46 S.E. 836. That portion of the charge of the court, which embodied the above principle of law, is not erroneous for any reason assigned in special ground 4. Floyd v. State, 36 Ga. 91; McEvoy v. State, 123 Ga. 506(1), 51 S.E. 500.

Accordingly, there being no merit in this special ground, and the general grounds and remaining special grounds having been abandoned, the trial judge did not err in denying the amended motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

TOWNSEND, P. J., and FRANKUM, J., concur.

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • Silas v. Bowen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • December 21, 1967
    ...for consideration. 6 Am.Jur. (2d), Sec. 163, p. 137; State v. Self (1954) 225 S.C. 267, 271, 82 S.E.2d 63; cf. Roberson v. State (1961) 104 Ga.App. 382, 121 S.E.2d 710. As the Court said in State v. Floyd (1859), 51 N.C. (6 Jones) 392, "One cannot be expected to encounter a lion as he would......