Roberts v. Connelly

Decision Date02 November 1970
Citation35 A.D.2d 813,316 N.Y.S.2d 675
PartiesLinnette ROBERTS et al., Appellants, v. John CONNELLY, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Zepnick & Director, New York City, Herbert Minster, Brooklyn, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Raymond J. MacDonnell, New York City, for defendant-respondent; Philip Hoffer, Rose L. Hoffer, New York City, Peter T. Affatato, Hicksville, on the brief.

Before CHRIST, P.J., and MARTUSCELLO, LATHAM, KLEINFELD and BRENNAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 27, 1969, dismissed, without costs.

No new or additional facts were presented in the papers submitted in support of plaintiff's motion characterized by them as one for 'reconsideration'. The motion, therefore, was in fact one for reargument of the prior application. An order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable (Kaplan v. Nadler, 23 A.D.2d 774, 258 N.Y.S.2d 584).

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Roberts v. County Court of Wyoming County
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 29, 1972
    ...to reargue is not appealable and the aggrieved party may only appeal from the original order, if it is timely made (Roberts v. Connelly, 35 A.D.2d 813, 316 N.Y.S.2d 675; Matter of Foglia, 32 A.D.2d 836, 303 N.Y.S.2d 206; 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac., 5514.03, 5701.23; 10 Carmody-W......
  • Williamson v. Shang
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 1979
    ...& Trust Co. v. Lichtenstein, 48 A.D.2d 790, 369 N.Y.S.2d 155, affd. 39 N.Y.2d 857, 386 N.Y.S.2d 215, 352 N.E.2d 132; Roberts v. Connelly, 35 A.D.2d 813, 316 N.Y.S.2d 675; Matter of Bauer (MVAIC), 31 A.D.2d 239, 244, 296 N.Y.S.2d 675, 680). Although CPLR 2221 which deals with motions for lea......
  • Lersch v. Pachinger
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 23, 1984
    ...646, 291 N.Y.S.2d 46; Matter of Onondaga County District Attorney's Office, 92 A.D.2d 32, 35, 459 N.Y.S.2d 507; cf. Roberts v. Connelly, 35 A.D.2d 813, 316 N.Y.S.2d 675). The motion should have been granted and, thereupon, the previous order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment ......
  • Lersch v. Pachinger
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 26, 1984
    ...646, 291 N.Y.S.2d 46; Matter of Onondaga County District Attorney's Office, 92 A.D.2d 32, 35, 459 N.Y.S.2d 507; cf. Roberts v. Connelly, 35 A.D.2d 813, 316 N.Y.S.2d 675). Defendants' newly discovered evidence, a check which they allege indicated repayment of one of the promissory notes sued......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT