Roberts v. Montgomery Cnty., 50 Sept.Term 2013

Decision Date17 May 2013
Docket NumberNo. 50 Sept.Term 2013,50 Sept.Term 2013
Citation66 A.3d 47,431 Md. 444
PartiesRoberts v. Montgomery County
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Opinion of the Court of Special Appeals unreported (No. 2067, Sept. Term, 2011).

Disposition: Granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Roberts v. Montgomery Cnty.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 2014
    ...374 Md. 566, 575 (2003) (“The positional-risk test is essentially a ‘but for’ test”). We granted certiorari, Roberts v. Montgomery County, 431 Md. 444, 66 A.3d 47 (2013), to consider the following questions: 12 1. A compensable workers' compensation injury is one that occurs in a place the ......
  • Roberts v. Montgomery Cnty.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • January 28, 2014
    ...374 Md. 566, 575 (2003) ("The positional-risk test is essentially a 'but for' test"). We granted certiorari, Roberts v. Montgomery County, 431 Md. 444, 66 A.3d 47 (2013), to consider the following questions:121. A compensable workers' compensation injury is one that occurs in a place the em......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT