Robertson v. Town of Hillsborough
| Decision Date | 05 December 1916 |
| Citation | 99 A. 1069 |
| Parties | ROBERTSON v. Town of HILLSBOROUGH. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Exceptions from Superior Court, Hillsborough County; Branch, Judge. Action by Elizabeth A. Robertson against the Town of Hillsborough, under Laws 1893, c. 59, for damages for injury while traveling on a highway. The court, subject to exception, instructed the jury that there was no evidence on which they could find that plaintiff's injuries were due to a dangerous embankment within the meaning of the statute. Exceptions overruled.
Robert W. Upton, of Concord, for plaintiff. Taggart, Burroughs, Wyman & McLane, of Manchester, for defendant.
The question presented was decided in Wilder v. Concord, 72 N. H. 259, 56 Atl. 193. Exception overruled. All concurred.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Krewski v. Town of Hooksett
...such * * * dangerous embankments and defective railings, which renders it unsuitable for the travel thereon.' See also, Robertson v. Hillsborough, 78 N.H. 603, 99 A. 1069; Robertson v. Monroe, 79 N.H. 336, 109 A. 495. It is not disputed that the policy of our Legislature beginning in 1893 a......
- State v. Duane