Robertson v. United States
Decision Date | 17 December 1919 |
Docket Number | 5382. |
Citation | 262 F. 948 |
Parties | ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
J. E Grigsby, of Albuquerque, N.M. (W. C. Heacock, of Albuquerque N.M., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
J. O Seth, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Santa Fe, N.M. (Summers Burkhart U.S. Atty., of Albuquerque, N.M., on the brief), for the United States.
Before CARLAND and STONE, Circuit Judges, and ELLIOTT, District Judge.
Error from conviction for violation of presidential regulations of June 27, 1918, promulgated under section 12 of the Draft Act (40 Stat. 82 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, Sec. 2019a)), prohibiting the transportation of intoxicants within a five-mile zone surrounding a military encampment. There are no properly preserved exceptions presenting any of the questions here argued. However, as the sentence involves imprisonment we have examined the points presented. The first contention is that no offense is stated in the information in violation of section 12. That section is:
It is true that this section does not designate the 'transportation' of liquor as an offense, but it does provide for regulations to be promulgated by the President, and section 1 of the regulations promulgated June 27, 1918, specifically prohibits that any liquor be 'transported to any place within any such zone.'
It is next claimed that the information was vitally defective in not alleging that the offense here charged was not punishable under the Articles of War. Such exception in the statute was no part of the definition of the offense, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stevens v. Biddle
... ... 209 STEVENS v. BIDDLE, Warden of U.S. Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kan. No. 6233. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. April 15, 1924 ... Turner ... W. Bell, of ... 336 ... (certiorari denied 252 U.S. 577, 40 Sup.Ct. 344, 64 L.Ed ... 725); Robertson v. United States (C.C.A.) 262 F ... 948; Hunter v. United States (C.C.A.) 272 F. 235, ... ...
-
Falconi v. United States
... ... misdemeanor infamous, are not infamous crimes, within the ... purview of the Fifth Amendment, and may be prosecuted by ... information. In re Bonner, Petitioner, 151 U.S. 242, ... 257, 14 Sup.Ct. 323, 38 L.Ed. 149; 4 Blackstone, Com. 310; ... Hunter v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 272 F. 235; Robertson v ... U.S. (C.C.A.) 262 F. 948, 950; Brown v. U.S., ... 260 F. 752, 171 C.C.A. 490; Blanc v. U.S., 258 F ... 921, 923, 169 C.C.A. 641; U.S. v. Wells Co. (D.C.) ... 186 F. 248; U.S. v. Camden Iron Works (D.C.) 150 F ... 214; De Four v. U.S., 260 F. 596, 598, 171 C.C.A ... 360; Weeks v ... ...
-
Hunter v. United States
...169 C.C.A. 641; Brown v. United States, 260 F. 752, 171 C.C.A. 490; Goublin v. United States, 261 F. 5, 171 C.C.A. 601; Robertson v. United States (C.C.A.) 262 F. 948; United States v. Achen (D.C.) 267 F. 595; v. United States, 117 U.S. 348, 6 Sup.Ct. 777, 29 L.Ed. 909; Bannon & Mulkey v. U......
-
Cleveland v. Mattingly
...therefor. Falconi v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 280 F. 766; Yaffee v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 276 F. 497; U.S. v. Achen (D.C.) 267 F. 595; Robertson v. U.S. (C.C.A.) 262 F. 948. On general proposition that misdemeanors may be prosecuted by information, see Brown v. U.S., 260 F. 752, 171 C.C.A. 490, Ex parte Brede......