Robertson v. W. Jersey & S. R. Co.
Decision Date | 08 November 1909 |
Citation | 79 N.J.L. 186,74 A. 300 |
Parties | ROBERTSON v. WEST JERSEY & S. R. CO. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from District Court of Atlantic City.
Action by Mary Robertson against the West Jersey & Seashore Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and rendered.
Argued June term, 1909, before REED, BERGEN, and VOORHEES, JJ.
Bourgeois & Sooy, for appellant. Lee F. Washington, for appellee.
This is an appeal from the district court of Atlantic City. The plaintiff, who brought suit to recover damages for personal injuries, became a passenger on the defendant's car in the city of Atlantic City, as she alleges in her state of demand, to be carried to Mediterranean avenue; but the defendant by its negligence in stopping the ear carried the plaintiff past Mediterranean avenue (at which place she could have safely alighted) to the corner of Drexel avenue, that the place where the defendant stopped the car was covered with ice and snow, and that the plaintiff in trying to find her way to New Hampshire avenue slipped and fell on the ice on Drexel avenue, outside of the defendant's right of way, and fractured her wrist. The case was tried by a jury, and the entire testimony has been sent to this court. The plaintiff describes the accident as follows: It appears that she had walked on Drexel avenue before falling, as she described it, "a good piece." She could not tell how far, but it might have been a quarter of a block. She further testified that when she first stepped out she got her feet in the snow. It was not slippery there as it was later on. The snow was soft, and she put her feet in it. She did not find the ice until she had gotten some distance. Just as soon as she got on the avenue she found the ground was frozen and hard. She made no objection to alighting at Drexel avenue, and the conductor made no suggestion to her that she should alight there; A motion was made to nonsuit, which was refused.
The only act of negligence attributed by the plaintiff to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rourke v. Hershock, A--50
...v. Del Monte and Public Service Coordinated Transport, 119 N.J.L. 3, 194 A. 256 (E. & A. 1937), Robertson v. West Jersey & Seashore S.R. Co., 79 N.J.L. 186, 74 A. 300 (Sup.Ct.1909), Walger v. Jersey City, etc., Street Railway Company, 71 N.J.L. 356, 59 A. 14 (Sup.Ct.1904), Whilt v. Public S......
-
Morris v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.
... ... street. She became a traveler upon the public highway, not a ... passenger. See, Robertson v. West Jersey & S. R ... Co., 79 N.J.L. 186 (74 A. 300); Creamer v. West End ... St. R. Co., 156 Mass. 320, 31 N.E. 391 ... ... ...
-
Higgins v. del Monte
...relation ceases, and with it the duty. Kelson v. Public Service R. Co., 94 N.J.Law, 527, 110 A. 919, approving Robertson v. West Jersey & S. R. Co., 79 N.J.Law, 186, 74 A. 300. Appeal from Supreme Action by Thomas C. Higgins against James Del Monte, George Del Monte, and the Public Service ......