Robinson v. Beto, 28186.
Citation | 426 F.2d 797 |
Decision Date | 28 May 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 28186.,28186. |
Parties | Charles David ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Austin, Tex., Lonny F. Zwiener, Robert C. Flowers, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent-appellant.
Charles David Robinson, pro se.
Robert E. Goodfriend, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner-appellee.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal by the State of Texas from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas granting appellee's petition for habeas corpus. Appellee was convicted of felony theft in a state criminal court and on October 23, 1963 was given the maximum sentence of ten years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Appellee appealed the judgment of conviction to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. That court affirmed the conviction. From the date of appellee's sentence, October 23, 1963, to the date the appeal was completed, October 16, 1964, appellee remained in the county jail.1 Article 768 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provided that a defendant who had appealed might be re-sentenced if the appeal was unsuccessful, in order to give him credit for time spent in jail pending appeal. The allowance of credit was and is within the trial court's complete discretion. In appellee's case, the sentencing judge did not choose to resentence him to give him credit for the eleven months and twenty-three days he had spent in jail pending appeal. Thus appellee commenced his ten-year prison term on October 16, 1964, even though he had been in jail since October 23, 1963.
The United States District Court found that the appellee should have been given credit for the time he had spent in the county jail pending his appeal. We agree.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jackson v. State of Ala.
...Amendment as it applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Cooks principally relies in this respect upon Robinson v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 797, and Hart v. Henderson, supra, wherein this court held the Texas and Louisiana mandatory suspension of execution statutes unconst......
-
Durkin v. Davis
...of a fear that the sentencing judge will not give him credit for the time that he has spent in jail pending appeal." Robinson v. Beto, 426 F.2d 797, 799 (5th Cir. 1970). Cf. North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d Second, the failure to give post-conviction credit ......
-
Bennett v. Lopeman
...within his control to exercise that appeal. See Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956); Robinson v. Beto, 426 F.2d 797 (5th Cir.1970). The Ohio Supreme Court has affirmed that the statute at issue here clearly speaks of a claimant's appeal rights ending 30 days......
-
Pruett v. State of Texas
...on the above statutes and on the cases of North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969); Robinson v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1970, 426 F.2d 797; Ex parte Griffith, 457 S.W.2d 60 (Tex.Crim.App.1970); Bennett v. State, 450 S.W.2d 652 (Tex.Cr. App.1970); Gilliam v. State, 1......