Robinson v. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen
| Decision Date | 15 May 1917 |
| Docket Number | 3223. |
| Citation | Robinson v. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen, 92 S.E. 730, 80 W.Va. 567 (W. Va. 1917) |
| Parties | ROBINSON v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN. |
| Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Submitted April 24, 1917.
Syllabus by the Court.
Fraternal benefit societies, in so far as they provide indemnity in case of disability or death of their members, legally are deemed mutual insurance companies, and their beneficiary certificates insurance contracts.
Such certificates, together with the provisions of the constitution of the society applicable thereto, in general are to be interpreted as other insurance contracts, and the rights and obligations of the parties measured accordingly. They are to be given their plain, natural, and obvious meaning and effect, when free from ambiguity. But the contract will liberally be construed to promote the benevolent objects of the society, and any doubt will be resolved in favor of the assured.
Fraternal benefit societies may establish and enforce reasonable rules and regulations for their government and for the settlement of internal disputes as to property rights; and members must submit to and comply with such regulations, and exhaust their remedies within the order, before resorting to the civil courts for redress.
Where the beneficiary certificates and constitution of the association provide that certain injuries shall constitute total and permanent disability entitling the member to payment of the full amount of his certificate, but that other claims for disability shall not create any legal liability or be the basis of a civil suit, but shall be determined by its beneficiary board, whose decision shall be final and conclusive, and a favorable finding a condition precedent to the right to receive benefits, such provisions will be upheld as valid regulations; and a decision of the board, made in good faith, will not be disturbed in any court of law.
Error to Circuit Court, Mineral County.
Assumpsit by Salem L. Robinson against the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen. Judgment for plaintiff on defendant's demurrer to evidence, and defendant brings error. Demurrer sustained and judgment entered for defendant.
Wm MacDonald, of Keyser, for plaintiff in error.
Chas Ritchie, of Charleston, for defendant in error.
LYNCH P.
Upon a demurrer to the evidence introduced by him on a trial in assumpsit, plaintiff, a railroad brakeman, recovered a judgment for the sum of $1,500 against the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, which it seeks to reverse upon this writ of error. Plaintiff bases his alleged right of recovery upon a beneficiary certificate issued to him by the grand lodge of the brotherhood April 24, 1912, and upon sections 68 and 70 of the constitution of that order. The injury averred consisted of the loss of three fingers from the right hand. In addition to the general issue entered, defendant asked but was denied leave to file a special plea setting up the decision of its beneficiary board under section 70 disallowing plaintiff's claim, as conclusive upon his right to a recovery in this action. The nature and existence of such liability, if any, is the sole qu estion requiring consideration on this review.
The certificate sued on provides that plaintiff, a member of H. G. Buxton Lodge, No. 758, "is entitled to all the rights, privileges and benefits of membership and to participate in the beneficiary department, class C, of said brotherhood to the amount set forth in the constitution thereof, which amount in the event of his total and permanent disability, as defined in section 68 of the constitution, shall be paid to him," or at his death to his wife if living, or if not to his personal representative. The certificate contains the express condition that the member receiving it "shall comply with the constitution, general rules and regulations now in force or that may hereafter be adopted by the within named brotherhood, which, as printed and published by the grand lodge of the said brotherhood, with the application for this certificate as signed by him and his medical examination, copies of which application and medical examination are attached hereto, all are made a part hereof, and together with this certificate constitute the contract between him and said brotherhood."
By the constitution of the grand lodge, in addition to various other funds, there is created a beneficiary fund, "to be disbursed exclusively in paying death, total and permanent disability and benevolent claims, as defined in sections 68, 69 and 70." In the maintenance of this fund all beneficiary members are required to participate by payment of monthly assessments levied upon them. For this purpose plaintiff was required to pay, and regularly did pay, an assessment of $2.50 per month. By virtue of section 60, "each certificate shall show in what class it is issued, and provide for the payment, in accordance with this constitution, of the full amount of such claims upon the death of the member insured therein, or upon his becoming totally and permanently disabled within the meaning of section 68." Sections 64 and 67 provide that the required proofs of death or disability shall be forwarded to the general secretary and treasurer within six months after the accident. Upon receipt of proof of death, "if the same shall be regular and satisfactory to said general secretary and treasurer, and the claim be by him deemed valid, the same shall be adjusted in its regular order" and the beneficiary "shall be entitled to receive from the beneficiary fund the full amount of the class in which the certificate was issued." But
Section 68 is entitled "total and permanent disability claims." It provides that "any beneficiary member in good standing who shall suffer the amputation or severance of an entire hand at or above the wrist joint, or who shall suffer the amputation or severance of an entire foot at or above the ankle joint, or who shall suffer the complete and permanent loss of sight of both eyes, shall be considered totally and permanently disabled, and shall thereby be entitled to receive, upon furnishing sufficient and satisfactory proofs of such total and permanent disability, the full amount of his beneficiary certificate, but not otherwise." Formal written proofs of such disability, signed by the insured member, his attending physician and certain officers of the subordinate lodge, containing
Section 70, upon which the declaration supporting the judgment is based, is entitled "Benevolent Claims." It is quoted in its entirety:
A brother desiring to present a claim under this section is required by section 71 to By another section it is made the "duty of the board of insurance to meet annually on the second Monday in January, at grand lodge...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting