Robinson v. Kind

Decision Date09 March 1897
Docket Number1,472.
Citation47 P. 977,23 Nev. 330
PartiesROBINSON v. KIND et al.
CourtNevada Supreme Court

On petition for rehearing. Denied.

For former report, see 47 P. 1.

The decree of the trial court is substantially a decree in rem. The court, by mere force of its decree, annulled the deed of conveyance, and vested the title to the property in the plaintiff. Having heretofore fully considered and passed upon the other questions presented by the petition for rehearing, and finding no reason or authority to induce us to change our former opinion, the petition is denied.

BELKNAP, C.J., and MASSEY, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 23, 2011
    ...Fairway Capital Corp., 483 F.3d 34, 40–41 (1st Cir.2007). The closest authority we have identified under Nevada law is Robinson v. Kind, 23 Nev. 330, 339, 47 P. 977 (1897) (order denying petition for rehearing). That case involved a suit “to cancel a deed of conveyance ... and revest the ti......
  • Hook v. Hoffman
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • April 13, 1915
    ... ... specially under the statute for the purpose of objecting to ... the jurisdiction. The ground of objection being that in this ... kind of action the court could acquire no jurisdiction of the ... person of defendant by this mode of service, such service not ... being due process of ... 500; Perkins v ... Wakeham, 86 Cal. 580, 21 Am. St. Rep. 67, 25 P. 51; ... Lane v. Innes, 43 Minn. 141, 45 N.W. 5; ... Robinson v. Kind, 23 Nev. 330, 340, 47 P ... 1, 977; Ormsby v. Ottman, 85 F. 496, 29 ... C.C.A. 295; Porter Land & Water Co. v ... Baskin, 43 ... ...
  • Chapman v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • May 30, 2013
    ...in rem where its “direct object is to reach and dispose of the property of the parties described in the complaint.” 23 Nev. 330, 343, 47 P. 977, 978–79 (1897). After rejecting the argument that an action to quiet title necessarily invokes in personam jurisdiction because it seeks an equitab......
  • Continental Gin Co. v. Arnold
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • February 15, 1916
    ... ... seeking relief against the defendant personally, then summons ... by publication cannot be upheld. In Robinson v ... Kind, 23 Nev. 330, 47 P. 1, 977, it is said: ... "An action to cancel a deed of real and personal ... property located in part in the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT