Robinson v. Largent, 17587.

Decision Date02 January 1970
Docket NumberNo. 17587.,17587.
Citation419 F.2d 1327
PartiesDavid ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Robert A. LARGENT (Parole Officer), Theodore H. Reiber (Member, Penna. Board of Parole), William F. Butler (Member, Penna. Board of Parole), and Paul J. Gernert (Chairman, Penna. Board of Parole).
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

David Robinson, pro se.

Frank P. Lawley, Deputy Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa. (William C. Sennett, Atty. Gen., Harrisburg, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before McLaughlin, Freedman and Adams, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a complaint under the Civil Rights Act against members of the Pennsylvania Parole Board and a parole officer seeking damages for alleged deprivation of rights guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss and while this was pending plaintiff filed an affidavit charging bias and prejudice on the part of the judge under 28 U.S.C. § 144. The district judge denied the motion for disqualification and plaintiff appealed.

The appeal is premature, for the dismissal of the motion for disqualification is not a final appealable order. See Green v. Murphy, 259 F.2d 591, 594 (3 Cir. 1958).

The appeal will be quashed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, In re, s. 79-3369
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 31 Marzo 1980
    ...Savings & Loan, 536 F.2d 1207, 1210 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 885, 97 S.Ct. 237, 50 L.Ed.2d 166 (1976); Robinson v. Largent, 419 F.2d 1327, 1327 (3d Cir. 1970); Dubnoff v. Goldstein, 385 F.2d 717, 721 (2d Cir. 1967); Rosen v. Sugarman, 357 F.2d 794, 796 (2d Cir. 1966); 13 Wright, M......
  • U.S. v. Gregory
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 25 Septiembre 1981
    ...United States v. Washington, 573 F.2d 1121 (9th Cir. 1978); Vuono v. United States, 441 F.2d 271 (4th Cir. 1971); Robinson v. Largent, 419 F.2d 1327 (3d Cir. 1970); Dubnoff v. Goldstein, 385 F.2d 717 (2d Cir. 1967). The question of disqualification is reviewable on mandamus, however, althou......
  • U.S. v. State of Wash., 77-2497
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 24 Abril 1978
    ...as such under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.,337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Robinson v. Largent,419 F.2d 1327 (3d Cir. 1970) (per curiam); Rosen v. Sugarman, 357 F.2d 794 (2d Cir. 1966); Baltuff v. United States, 35 F.2d 507 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 278 U.S. ......
  • City of Pittsburgh v. Simmons, 84-3081
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 22 Marzo 1984
    ...is reviewable only after final judgment. Green v. Murphy, 259 F.2d 591, 594 (3d Cir.1958) (en banc). 1 See also Robinson v. Largent, 419 F.2d 1327, 1327 (3d Cir.1970). However, we have deep concern with one of the matters underlying the City's mandamus petition. The petition for writ of man......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT