Robinson v. Rankin
| Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama |
| Writing for the Court | MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE |
| Decision Date | 26 September 2018 |
| Docket Number | Case No.: 2:14-cv-01886-MHH |
| Citation | Robinson v. Rankin, Case No.: 2:14-cv-01886-MHH (N.D. Ala. Sep 26, 2018) |
| Parties | CALVIN LEE ROBINSON as Administrator of THE ESTATE OF CALVIN LEE ROBINSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. L.B. RANKIN and TODD EASTERWOOD, Defendants. |
This case concerns the fatal shooting of plaintiff Calvin Lee Robinson's son, Calvin Lee Robinson, Jr. In this opinion, to distinguish between Mr. Robinson and his son, the Court refers to the plaintiff as Mr. Robinson and to his son as Calvin Jr. Calvin Jr. was killed when Hueytown Police Officer Todd Easterwood fired into a car in which Calvin Jr. was riding. When Officer Easterwood fired, he and his partner, Lieutenant L.B. Rankin, were attempting to arrest Calvin Jr. and the car's driver, Isaiah Brown, because the officers believed they had just seen Mr. Brown hand illegal drugs to the driver of another vehicle in a drive-by exchange. The officers were correct; in the drive-by transaction, Mr. Brown had received $20 in exchange for a small quantity of drugs. Minutes later, Calvin Jr. was dead.
Mr. Robinson asserts a claim against Officer Easterwood under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Mr. Robinson contends that by firing into the vehicle, Officer Easterwood used excessive force to seize Calvin Jr. in violation of the Fourth Amendment. (Doc. 37, p. 2). Mr. Robinson also asserts claims against Officer Easterwood and Lieutenant Rankin under Ala. Code § 6-5-410, contending that both officers are liable for punitive damages for wrongful death under Alabama law. (Doc. 37, p. 3). Officer Easterwood asserts a defense of qualified immunity to the § 1983 claim, and both officers assert a defense of state agent immunity to the state law claim. The officers ask the Court to enter judgment in their favor on these grounds. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants the officers' motion.
"The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). To demonstrate that there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact that precludes summary judgment, a party opposing a motion for summary judgment must cite "to particular parts of materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(1)(A). The Court views the evidence in the record in the light mostfavorable to Mr. Robinson because he is the non-movant. See White v. Beltram Edge Tool Supply, Inc., 789 F.3d 1188, 1191 (11th Cir. 2015); see also Feliciano v. City of Miami Beach, 707 F.3d 1244, 1252 (11th Cir. 2013) (). "The court need consider only the cited materials, but it may consider other materials in the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(3).
Calvin Robinson Jr. and Isaiah Brown were neighbors and long-time friends. (Doc. 42-7, p. 12). On the morning of August 22, 2012, Mr. Brown went to Homewood to pay some parking tickets and have his license reinstated. As he returned home, he saw Calvin Jr. walking and offered him a ride. (Doc. 66-1, pp. 50, 76-77; see also Doc. 47-7, p. 7, ABI Brown interview pp. 21-23). The two eventually visited the home of Mr. Brown's sister. (Doc. 66-1, p. 51). While there, Mr. Brown received a phone call from a woman who wanted to buy illegal drugs. (Doc. 66-1, pp. 83-84; see also Doc. 47-7, p. 10, ABI Brown interview pp. 33-34). The buyer was Lauren Foust, an acquaintance of Calvin Jr.'s. Calvin Jr. had given Mr. Brown's cell phone number to Ms. Foust. (Doc. 66-1, p. 59). Mr. Robinson and Calvin Jr. drove to an undisclosed location to pick up the drugs and then drove to meet Ms. Foust. (Doc. 66-1, pp. 90-91).
That morning, Mr. Brown had a gun in his car. He usually stored the gun in a cinder block at his house, but the night before, he had put the gun in his car "[f]or protection, because we had went out." (Doc. 66-1, pp. 61-65, 73, 78, 80). The gun was between the front seats of Mr. Brown's car somewhere near the center console. (Doc. 66-1, pp. 66-68, 71). Mr. Brown did not remove the gun from his car when he returned home in the early hours of August 22, 2012, and he did not see the gun as he was driving his car later that day. (Doc. 66-1, pp. 69-70, 72). Mr. Brown stated that he forgot that the gun was in his car. (Doc. 66-1, p. 70).
That same morning, Lieutenant Rankin and Officer Easterwood were following up on drug-related complaints in the Brighton and Bessemer areas. (Doc. 42-2, pp. 11-12). Although they were officers in the Hueytown Police Department, they were assigned to the United Narcotics Investigation Task Force ("UNIT"). As members of UNIT, the officers frequently patrolled for drug-related offenses outside of Hueytown. (Doc. 42-2, pp. 8, 10; Doc. 49-4, p. 4). Lieutenant Rankin and Officer Easterwood wore plain clothes and patrolled in "an unmarked silver Chevrolet Malibu equipped with blue lights and sirens." (Doc. 42-2, p. 26).
The officers were patrolling along the Bessemer Super Highway when they noticed a white Ford Explorer parked in the lot of an abandoned store. (Doc. 42-2, p. 12; Doc. 47-2, p. 1). The vehicle had a number of distinguishing characteristics — a broken window and tow numbers on the rear window — that allowed theofficers to identify the Explorer as Lauren Foust's vehicle. (Doc. 47-2, p. 1). The officers knew that Ms. Foust was a drug-user. (Doc. 42-2, p. 12; Doc. 42-4, pp. 7-9). The officers parked across the street and observed Ms. Foust as she sat in her car making frequent phone calls and glancing about. (Doc. 42-2, pp. 12-13).1 Based on Ms. Foust's behavior, the officers' familiarity with her drug use, and their assessment of the locale as a "high drug area," the officers decided to follow Ms. Foust. (Doc. 42-2, pp. 12-13; Doc. 42-4, pp. 8-9).
The officers followed Ms. Foust along the Bessemer Super Highway toward Brighton until she turned on Parker Springs Road into a residential neighborhood. (Doc. 42-2, p. 14; Doc. 42-4, p. 9). The officers drove a block further and circled back towards the intersection of Hardy Street and Parker Springs Road to regain contact with Ms. Foust. (Doc. 42-2, p. 14; Doc. 42-4, p. 9).2 As the officers turned back onto Parker Springs Road, they saw Ms. Foust's vehicle stopped on Hardy Street beside a black Mazda, Mr. Brown's vehicle. (Doc. 42-4, pp. 9-10). The officers stopped just past the intersection of Parker Springs Road and theBessemer Super Highway to observe the interaction between the occupants of the two vehicles. (Doc. 42-2, p. 15; Doc. 42-4, p. 10).
Mr. Brown's car was "driver to driver" with Ms. Foust's vehicle. (Doc. 66-1, p. 91). Mr. Brown and Ms. Foust made a hand-to-hand exchange and then drove off in separate directions. The transaction took less than one minute, and Ms. Foust paid $20 for the drugs that she bought. After handing off the drugs, Mr. Brown and Calvin Jr. left and drove towards the intersection of Hardy Street and Parker Springs Road. (Doc. 66-1, pp. 50, 76-77, 85, 89-94; see also Doc. 47-7, p. 3, ABI Brown interview p. 5; see also Doc. 47-7, p. 11, ABI Brown interview pp. 39-40; Doc. 42-2, p. 42). They slowed as they approached the intersection. (Doc. 66-1, pp. 116, 118; Doc. 47-7, p. 13, ABI Brown interview p. 48).
Meanwhile, Lieutenant Rankin and Officer Easterwood were reacting to the drug transaction. They were not close enough to the transaction to confirm that drugs were involved, but based on their training and experience, the officers believed that a drug sale had occurred. (Doc. 42-2, p. 15; Doc. 42-4, p. 10). Lieutenant Rankin also believed that he recognized the black Mazda from another hand-to-hand drug sale that he had witnessed one week earlier. (Doc. 42-4, pp. 7-8). Lieutenant Rankin made a U-turn, drove the unmarked patrol car towards the intersection, and attempted to block the Mazda as Mr. Brown reached the stop sign at the intersection of Parker Springs Road and Hardy Street. The officersemerged from their car, drew their guns, and moved towards the Mazda. (Doc. 42-2, pp. 15, 17, 27; Doc. 42-4, p. 15-16; Doc. 42-4, p. 10; Doc. 47-7, p. 13, ABI Brown interview p. 48; Doc. 66-1, p. 95). Officer Easterwood was heading towards the driver's side of the Mazda, and Lieutenant Rankin was heading towards the passenger side. (Doc. 42-2, pp. 17-18, 44-45; Doc. 42-4, p. 17). Mr. Brown described the scene this way:
[Officers Easterwood and Rankin] are in regular clothes, both of them jumped out with guns out. All I seen was two - it was two white boys jumped out both of them got pistols out and everything. The one on the driver's side was running to my car. He went around to my car. First thing in my mind was, "Oh, Lord, we are fixing to get robbed" or something like that. Like I said, there - would be a gun in the car. Next thing you know, he just — he run on to the side of the car, and my first thought was "go, go, go." Because I'm thinking, we was fixing to get robbed and he's got a gun out here. Whatever he was going to do, what's going to do. He up right now. He got the up, period. So my first — mind, is smashed the gas and go. When I hit the gas, I'm trying to turn back to the left, and like I said, they done block the left. My only way to go back was to the left. I'm going to the left.
(Doc. 66-1, pp. 95-96). Mr. Brown explained that as he accelerated and tried to turn left, Officer Easterwood began shooting. Mr. Brown stated: (Doc. 66-1, p. 104; see also Doc. 66-1, pp. 118-20; Doc. 47-7, p. 2, ABI...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting