Robinson v. South Carolina, No. 13–10163.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation189 L.Ed.2d 845,82 USLW 3747,134 S.Ct. 2888
Docket NumberNo. 13–10163.
Decision Date30 June 2014
PartiesClarence ROBINSON, petitioner, v. SOUTH CAROLINA.

134 S.Ct. 2888
189 L.Ed.2d 845
82 USLW 3747

Clarence ROBINSON, petitioner,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 13–10163.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 30, 2014.


Case below, 407 S.C. 169, 754 S.E.2d 862.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • State v. Counts, Appellate Case No. 2013–000086.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • July 8, 2015
    ...reverse only if there is clear error.” Robinson v. State, 407 S.C. 169, 180–81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 2888, 189 L.Ed.2d 845 (2014) ; see State v. Tindall, 388 S.C. 518, 520, 698 S.E.2d 203, 205 (2010) (recognizing that in criminal cases an appell......
  • State v. Counts, Appellate Case No. 2013-000086
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • July 8, 2015
    ...and will reverse only if there is clear error." Robinson v. State, 407 S.C. 169, 180-81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2888 (2014); see State v. Tindall, 388 S.C. 518, 520, 698 S.E.2d 203, 205 (2010) (recognizing that in criminal cases an appellate court sits to revie......
  • State v. Alston, Appellate Case No. 2015-002134
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • March 7, 2018
    ...only if there is clear error." Robinson v. State , 407 S.C. 169, 180-81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S. Ct. 2888, 189 L.Ed. 2d 845 (2014). "However, this deference does not bar this Court from conducting its own review of the record to determine whether the......
  • State v. Boston, Appellate Case No. 2018-000504
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • March 10, 2021
    ...reverse only if there is clear error." Robinson v. State, 407 S.C. 169, 180-81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied, 573 U.S. 952, 134 S. Ct. 2888, 189 L.Ed.2d 845 ; see 433 S.C. 182 State v. Tindall, 388 S.C. 518, 520, 698 S.E.2d 203, 205 (2010) (recognizing that in criminal cases an ......
4 cases
  • State v. Counts, Appellate Case No. 2013–000086.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • July 8, 2015
    ...reverse only if there is clear error.” Robinson v. State, 407 S.C. 169, 180–81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 2888, 189 L.Ed.2d 845 (2014) ; see State v. Tindall, 388 S.C. 518, 520, 698 S.E.2d 203, 205 (2010) (recognizing that in criminal cases an appell......
  • State v. Counts, Appellate Case No. 2013-000086
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • July 8, 2015
    ...and will reverse only if there is clear error." Robinson v. State, 407 S.C. 169, 180-81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2888 (2014); see State v. Tindall, 388 S.C. 518, 520, 698 S.E.2d 203, 205 (2010) (recognizing that in criminal cases an appellate court sits to revie......
  • State v. Alston, Appellate Case No. 2015-002134
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina
    • March 7, 2018
    ...only if there is clear error." Robinson v. State , 407 S.C. 169, 180-81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied , ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S. Ct. 2888, 189 L.Ed. 2d 845 (2014). "However, this deference does not bar this Court from conducting its own review of the record to determine whether the......
  • State v. Boston, Appellate Case No. 2018-000504
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of South Carolina
    • March 10, 2021
    ...reverse only if there is clear error." Robinson v. State, 407 S.C. 169, 180-81, 754 S.E.2d 862, 868 (2014), cert. denied, 573 U.S. 952, 134 S. Ct. 2888, 189 L.Ed.2d 845 ; see 433 S.C. 182 State v. Tindall, 388 S.C. 518, 520, 698 S.E.2d 203, 205 (2010) (recognizing that in criminal cases an ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT