Robinson v. State

CourtTexas Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtHurt
CitationRobinson v. State, 9 S.W. 61, 26 Tex. App. 82 (Tex. App. 1888)
Decision Date29 June 1888
PartiesROBINSON v. STATE.

Appeal from Wise county court; W. H. BULLOCK, Judge.

J. P. Robinson appeals from a conviction for a violation of the local option law. The penalty assessed was 20 days in the county jail, and a fine of $25.

Graham & McMurray and Patterson & Martin, for appellant. Asst. Atty. Gen. Davidson, for the State.

HURT, J.

This is a conviction for violating the local option law. It appears from the record that the act of selling the liquor was committed on February 6, 1888. The election at which the law was adopted in Wise county was held March 14, 1887. This trial was had April 11, 1888. The act of the legislature amending the local option law took effect March 30, 1887. It will be seen from the above statement that the people of Wise county adopted the law as it stood before the amendments were made by the legislature, and that the offense was committed, and the trial had, after the amendment had been enacted. The court charged the penalty prescribed by the amendment of March 30, 1887. This court, at this term, has held that when the people of a certain locality have adopted the local option law at an election held before the amendment was passed, that such amendment was not intended to and cannot affect the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
15 cases
  • Ex Parte Myer
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 23, 1918
    ...R. 577, 72 S. W. 837; Cross v. State, 49 Tex. Cr. R. 437, 94 S. W. 1015; Lawhon v. State, 26 Tex. App. 101, 9 S. W. 355; Robinson v. State, 26 Tex. App. 82, 9 S. W. 61; Dawson v. State, 25 Tex. App. 670, 8 S. W. 820; Ex parte Fields, 39 Tex. Cr. R. 55, 46 S. W. 1127; Ex parte Rippy, 44 Tex.......
  • Slack v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 1, 1911
    ...of this state the doctrine that the penalty for making a single sale of intoxicating liquors cannot be changed. See Robinson v. State, 26 Tex. App. 82, 9 S. W. 61; Lawhon v. State, 26 Tex. App. 101, 9 S. W. 355; Ex parte Baines, 39 Tex. Cr. R. 63, 45 S. W. 24; and Lewis v. State, 58 Tex. Cr......
  • Ex Parte Mode
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 13, 1915
    ...Lewis v. State, 58 Tex. Cr. R. 351, 127 S. W. 808, 21 Ann. Cas. 656; Dawson v. State, 25 Tex. App. 670, 8 S. W. 820; Robinson v. State, 26 Tex. App. 82, 9 S. W. 61; Ex parte Cox, 28 Tex. App. 537, 13 S. W. 862; Ex parte Bains, 39 Tex. Cr. R. 62, 45 S. W. 24; Aaron v. State, 34 Tex. Cr. R. 1......
  • Ex Parte Fulton
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 14, 1919
    ...203 S. W. 1102; Dawson v. State, 25 Tex. App. 670, 8 S. W. 820; Lawhon v. State, 26 Tex. App. 101, 9 S. W. 355; Robinson v. State, 26 Tex. App. 82, 9 S. W. 61; State v. Texas Brewing Co., 106 Tex. 121, 157 S. W. The question of the constitutionality of both acts is squarely raised and prese......
  • Get Started for Free