Robinson v. State

Decision Date24 April 1997
Docket NumberNo. 87686,87686
CitationRobinson v. State, 692 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1997)
Parties22 Fla. L. Weekly S214 Kenneth B. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
98 cases
  • United States v. Seabrooks
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • October 19, 2016
    ...theft only and does not involve the degree of physical force needed to sustain a robbery conviction under § 812.13(1). Robinson v. State, 692 So.2d 883, 886 (Fla. 1997) ; McCloud v. State, 335 So.2d 257, 258–59 (Fla. 1976) ; Montsdoca v. State, 84 Fla. 82, 93 So. 157, 159 (1922). In 1997, t......
  • Stokeling v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 15, 2019
    ...necessary to commit robbery requires "resistance by the victim that is overcome by the physical force of the offender." Robinson v. State, 692 So.2d 883, 886 (1997).Instead of applying a categorical approach to the elements clause, the District Court evaluated whether the facts of Stokeling......
  • United States v. Proctor
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • March 16, 2022
    ...force of the offender"—mere "snatching of property from another" did not suffice. Id. at 555 (emphases added) (quoting Robinson v. State , 692 So.2d 883, 886 (Fla. 1997) ). Because it follows that "the force necessary to overcome a victim's physical resistance is inherently ‘violent,’ " the......
  • State v. Benenati
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • September 3, 2002
    ...prove a defendant used physical force not only to take a victim's property, but also to overcome the victim's resistance. Robinson v. Florida, 692 So.2d 883 (Fla.1997). Compare State v. Stevens, 184 Ariz. 411, 413, 909 P.2d 478, 480 (App.1995) (relevant behavior under ? 13-1902 must be dire......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Horizontal federalism in an age of criminal justice interconnectedness.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 154 No. 2, December 2005
    • December 1, 2005
    ...because it was unclear whether or not the underlying conduct constituted a felony in New York). (60) See, e.g., Robinson v. State, 692 So. 2d 883, 888 (Fla. 1997) (rejecting the use of a Georgia conviction for "robbery by sudden snatching" because its elements were not "substantially simila......