Robinson v. State
| Decision Date | 18 January 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 515 Sept.Term 2012,515 Sept.Term 2012 |
| Citation | 59 A.3d 506,430 Md. 11 |
| Parties | Emmanuel Ford Robinson v. State of Maryland |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Emmanuel Ford Robinson
v.
State of Maryland
No. 515 Sept.Term 2012
Court of Appeals of Maryland
January 18, 2013
Opinion of the Court of Special Appeals unreported (No. 1997, Sept. Term, 2011).
Disposition: Granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Robinson v. State
...defense attorneys do, that there wasn't any scientific link of the defendant to the crime.” 1 We granted certiorari, Robinson v. State, 430 Md. 11, 59 A.3d 506 (2013), to consider the following questions, which we have renumbered: 2 1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in providing t......
-
Robinson v. State
...good defense attorneys do, that therewasn't any scientific link of the defendant to the crime."1 We granted certiorari, Robinson v. State, 430 Md. 11, 59 A.3d 506 (2013), to consider the following questions, which we have renumbered:21. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in providing ......
-
Robinson v. State
...defense attorneys do, that there wasn't any scientific link of the defendant to the crime."1 We granted certiorari, Robinson v. State, 430 Md. 11, 59 A.3d 506 (2013), to consider the following questions, which we have renumbered:21. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in providing to t......
-
Price v. State, 480 Sept.Term 2012
...430 Md. 1159 A.3d 506Taquez Pricev.State of MarylandNo. 480 Sept.Term 2012Court of Appeals of MarylandJanuary 18, Opinion of the Court of Special Appeals unreported (No. 276, Sept. Term, 2011). Disposition: Both granted....