Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of Cal.
Docket Number | A141396 |
Decision Date | 18 October 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
49 cases
-
State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. v. Lara
...of a stipulation or for a longer period than allowed by stipulation." ( Rule 3.1702(d) ; see Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of Cal. (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 304, 327, 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 81 ( Robinson ) [trial court's "finding of ‘good cause’ is generally reviewed deferentially, solely for abuse of discret......
-
Reid v. City of San Diego
...is a decision that the merits need not be reached because there is no longer a live controversy." ( Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of California (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 304, 322, 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 81.)There is one additional reason this appeal is not frivolous. Although Plaintiffs' attempts to overcome ......
-
McGill v. Citibank, N.A.
...court from issuing injunctive relief to prevent a posttrial continuation of the unlawful conduct."]; Robinson v. U–Haul Co. of California (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 304, 315, 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 81 ["[T]here is no hard-and-fast rule that a party's discontinuance of illegal behavior makes injunctive r......
-
L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. T.P. (In re D.P.)
...103 Cal.Rptr.3d 889.) We review de novo the Court of Appeal's determination that this case is moot. ( Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of California (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 304, 319, 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 81.)The Courts of Appeal have held that when a juvenile court's finding forms the basis for an order that......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases null
...Superior Court, 56 Cal. 4th 1218, 158 Cal. Rptr. 3d 261, 302 P.3d 574 (2013)—Ch. 5-A, §6.1; §6.2 Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of California, 4 Cal. App. 5th 304, 209 Cal. Rptr. 3d 81 (1st Dist. 2016)—Ch. 6, §4.1.2 Rockwell Internat. Corp. v. Superior Court, 26 Cal. App. 4th 1255, 32 Cal. Rptr. 2d......
-
Chapter 6 - §4. Raising objection under §352
...being cumulative), disapproved on other grounds, People v. Doolin (2009) 45 Cal.4th 390; Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of Cal. (1st Dist.2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 304, 323 (noting that party's failure to raise specific Evid. C. §352 objection does not preclude court from excluding evidence on that groun......
-
Companies Face Consequences for Unenforceable Noncompetition Clauses in California
...Inc., 187 Cal. App. 4th 60 (2010).6. Edwards v. Arthur Anderson LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008); Robinson v. U-Haul Co. of Cal., 4 Cal. App. 5th 304 (2016); Dowell v. Biosense Webster, Inc., 179 Cal. App. 4th 564 (2009); Application Grp., Inc v. Hunter Grp., 61 Cal. App. 4th 881, 906-07 (1998).......
-
California Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Update: Substantive Law
...Prof. Code § 17043.30. Turnbull & Turnbull v. ARA Tramp., Inc., 219 Cal. App. 3d 811, 822 (1990).31. 246 Cal. App. 4th at 1455-56.32. 4 Cal. App. 5th 304 (2016).33. Id. at 315 (emphasis in original) (internal citations omitted).34. Id. at 316.35. Id.36. 1 Cal. App. 5th 635 (2016).37. Id. at......
Request a trial to view additional results