Robison v. Wolf
Decision Date | 26 November 1901 |
Citation | 27 Ind.App. 683,62 N.E. 74 |
Parties | ROBISON v. WOLF. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from superior court, Marion county; Vinson Carter, Judge.
Action by George Wolf, as receiver of the Globe Accident Insurance Company of Indianapolis, against Edward J. Robison. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.Chas. F. Coffin and Henry M. Dowling, for appellant. E. A. Brown and Carson & Moore, for appellee.
Appellee, as receiver of the Globe Accident Insurance Company of Indianapolis, brought this action to recover the annual premium alleged to be due and unpaid upon policy No. 24,803, issued to appellant. A demurrer was overruled to the complaint, and an answer of general denial filed (a second paragraph of answer was also filed, but its averments are not material at this time); trial had; verdict and judgment for appellee for $5.25. The evidence shows that the Globe Accident Insurance Company was organized January 30, 1892, under the act of March 9, 1883, and acts amendatory thereto (Burns' Rev. St. 1901, §§ 4897, 4898, 4900-4903). Its articles of association are in part as follows: In accordance with the power conferred by section 2 of the act, certain by-laws were adopted by the company. These by-laws are in part as follows: “The object of this company is to insure its members against bodily injury caused solely by external, violent, and accidental means, and to pay them or their beneficiaries, within the limitations of their contracts or insurance, indemnities or benefits to be provided by assessments equitably levied upon the entire membership.” “Said directors shall receive no salary or other compensation for their services, but shall serve gratuitously, as a favor to the other members.” “This company shall be charged with and responsible for only the net cash actually received by it, and nothing but the actual cash shall be considered payment.” On November 23, 1895, appellant made his application for membership in said company. The application was “filled out” by the applicant. Most of the matter stated therein is not relevant at this time. Parts of the application that may be so regarded are as follows:
On November 25th a policy was issued, parts of which are as follows:
On the same day the policy was issued, applicant paid the company $25, and received its receipt therefor. On November 25, 1896, he also paid $25 to it, receiving a receipt therefor. On November 24, 1897, he paid to it $19.75, and received a receipt for $25, in terms as follows:
“Renewal term receipt. Policy No. 24,803. Maximum death benefit, $10,000. Renewal receipt No. 1,505. Amount of Premium, $25.00. The Globe Accident Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Ind., acknowledges the receipt from Edward J. Robison of twenty-five dollars, and hereby continues in force policy No. 24,803, issued by the Globe Accident Insurance Company of Indianapolis, Ind., from 12 o'clock noon of the date hereof to 12 o'clock noon of the 25th day of November, 1898. Dated this 24th day of November, 1897. W. A. Walker, Secy., per Brown, Cashier.
+--------------------------+ ¦Amount of premium ¦$25 00 ¦ +------------------+-------¦ ¦Renewal of Com ¦5 25 ¦ +------------------+-------¦ ¦Cash received ¦$19 75”¦ +--------------------------+
It was found by the jury that appellant had been insured, by virtue of such payment, during the year ending November 25, 1898. If the entire premium were unpaid, and no receipt had been executed, there could be no doubt of the receiver's right, under the proper order of the court appointing him, to recover it. The fact that a partial payment has been made thereon cannot affect his right to collect the unpaid portion. The effect of a receipt is to put the burden of proof upon the person denying its correctness, but it may be explained, qualified, or contradicted by parol. Railroad Co. v. Crumbo, 4 Ind. App. 456, 30 N. E. 434;Moore v. Korty, 11 Ind. 342. There is no dispute as to the facts in this case. Appellant testified to a cash payment of $19.75. Under the by-laws, to the terms of which he agreed to conform when he became a member, “nothing but the actual cash shall be considered payment.” There is no evidence that the residue of the annual premium has been paid, but, as equivalent thereto, the following claim is made in appellant's brief: In order to avoid confusion, it is well to analyze the foregoing. It amounts to this: That the Globe Company had collected $5.25 for appellant from some one, and treated such amount as cash applied. This brings us to the root of the trouble, and the further inquiry is as to how the company became possessed of appellant's money, from whom was it collected, and what for? On the same date of the policy, and as part of the same transaction, the following writing was made:
By the terms of this instrument, appellant became one of not more than 500 persons for...
To continue reading
Request your trial