Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, No. 88-3547

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore GIBBONS, Chief Judge, and SEITZ and GREENBERG; GREENBERG
Citation868 F.2d 600
PartiesIn the Matter of ROCHESTER & PITTSBURGH COAL CO., Petitioner, v. Mike KRECOTA, Claimant-Respondent, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Party-in-Interest/Respondent.
Docket NumberNo. 88-3547
Decision Date23 February 1989

Page 600

868 F.2d 600
In the Matter of ROCHESTER & PITTSBURGH COAL CO., Petitioner,
v.
Mike KRECOTA, Claimant-Respondent,
and
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United
States Department of Labor, Party-in-Interest/Respondent.
No. 88-3547.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 24, 1989.
Decided Feb. 23, 1989.

Eric Jones (argued), Tillman & Thompson, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner.

Page 601

Michael J. Denney, Nicholas J. Levintow (argued), U.S. Dept. of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, Washington, D.C., George R. Salem, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor for Black Lung Benefits, Donald J. Denney, Counsel for appellate Litigation, for party-in-interest/respondent.

Blair V. Pawlowski, U.M.W.A. District No. 2 Legal Counsel, Ebensburg, Pa., for Mike Krecota.

Before GIBBONS, Chief Judge, and SEITZ and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Rochester and Pittsburgh Coal Company petitions this court for review of a decision of the Benefits Review Board (BRB) dated June 22, 1988, determining that Mike Krecota was eligible for benefits payable by the Coal Company under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901-45. We have jurisdiction under 30 U.S.C. Sec. 932(a) and 33 U.S.C. Sec. 921(c). See Sulyma v. Director, OWCP, 827 F.2d 922, 922 (3d Cir.1987).

Krecota had been employed for 37 years with the Coal Company and the Creighton Fuel Company before retiring on June 24, 1977, 30 to 32 of which were spent working in the mines. Prior to retirement Krecota filed a claim with the Social Security Administration for benefits under Part B of the Act. This claim was denied and on June 30, 1977, Krecota filed a claim with the Department of Labor for benefits under Part C of the Act. The Part C claim was administratively approved, and both Administrative Law Judge Daniel L. Leland and the BRB affirmed. This appeal concerns only the Part C claim.

On appeal the Coal Company argues that any liability for benefits should have been transferred to the government's Black Lung Disability Trust Fund, and that if the liability was not transferred Krecota was not eligible for benefits. 1 With regard to its contention that Krecota was not eligible for benefits the Coal Company argues that medical evidence did not establish Krecota's total disability for all, or at least a substantial portion of, the period covered by the BRB's award.

ALJ Leland held a formal hearing on January 10, 1986, during which the Coal Company presented evidence to support its contention that liability for payment should have been transferred from the Coal Company to the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund. Section 205 of the Black Lung Benefits Amendments Act of 1981, Pub.L. No. 97-119, 95 Stat. 1635 (codified at 30 U.S.C. Secs. 932(c) & 932(j)(3)), establishes the criteria for the transfer of claims to the Trust Fund.

A claim may be transferred when the "claim [was] denied before March 1, 1978, and such claim [was then] or [was subsequently] approved in accordance with the provisions of section 945 of [title 30 U.S.C.]." 30 U.S.C. Sec. 932(j)(3); see id. Sec. 932(c). It is uncontested that Krecota filed a Part B claim which was denied before March 1, 1978, and that this claim was not subsequently approved. 2 Thus, on the face of the statute it appears that there is no basis for transferring liability from the Coal Company to the Trust Fund.

Nonetheless, the Coal Company argues that transfer of both the Part B and Part C claims is proper because it asserts that Krecota was never sent a card allowing him to elect review of his Part B claim. That portion of the Act which specifies the mechanism by which claimants were to be notified of their opportunity to request administrative

Page 602

review of their denied Part B claims, 30 U.S.C. Sec. 945, is expressly referenced by section 205 of the 1981 Amendments. Section 945 requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to notify claimants whose Part B were denied before March 1, 1978, 3 that upon request the denial would be reviewed by the claimant's choice of either the Secretary of Health and Human Services or the Secretary of Labor. Moreover, the two different review routes involved different procedures.

The Coal Company asks this court to conclude that Krecota was never sent an election card and that if he had received a card he would have requested review by one of the two department heads and that if he had elected review his claim would have subsequently been approved. We, however, reject this argument as there is nothing in the statute or regulations which provides that operators may raise claims for miners not afforded their rights to seek review of denied Part B claims. 4 Further, it could not be held that Krecota...

To continue reading

Request your trial
166 practice notes
  • Helen Min. Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor, No. 89-3418
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • January 28, 1991
    ...of an earlier denied claim for benefits. Accordingly, we revisit the problem we considered in Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600 (3d Cir.1989), in which we held that under the Black Lung Benefits Act a request for review of denied benefits must come from the miner, not......
  • Lovilia Coal Co. v. Harvey, No. 95-4122
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • August 1, 1997
    ...determine who should pay before establishing whether the claimant is eligible for benefits." Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600, 601 n. 1 (3d Cir.1989). "In this case, however, the government conceded that [Harvey] was eligible for benefits." Id. "Thus, if we determine......
  • Dempsey v. Sewell Coal Co., BRB 03-0615 BLA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Black Lung Complaints
    • June 28, 2004
    ...month in which claimant became totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis. 20 C.F.R. §725.503; see Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600, 12 BLR 2-178 (3d Cir. 1989); Lykins v. Director, OWCP, 12 BLR 1-181 (1989). If the date of onset of total disability due to pneumoconiosis......
  • Dalton v. Frontier-Kemper Constructors, Inc., BRB 11-0852 BLA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Black Lung Complaints
    • December 7, 2012
    ...20 C.F.R. §725.503(b), (d)(1); Owens v. Jewell Smokeless Coal Corp., 14 BLR 1-47 (1990); see Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600, 603-04, 12 BLR 2-178, 2-184-85 (3d Cir. 1989). As neither Dr. Beck nor Dr. Cohen opined that the miner was disabled due to pneumoconiosis in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
166 cases
  • Helen Min. Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor, No. 89-3418
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • January 28, 1991
    ...of an earlier denied claim for benefits. Accordingly, we revisit the problem we considered in Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600 (3d Cir.1989), in which we held that under the Black Lung Benefits Act a request for review of denied benefits must come from the miner, not......
  • Lovilia Coal Co. v. Harvey, No. 95-4122
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • August 1, 1997
    ...determine who should pay before establishing whether the claimant is eligible for benefits." Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600, 601 n. 1 (3d Cir.1989). "In this case, however, the government conceded that [Harvey] was eligible for benefits." Id. "Thus, if we determine......
  • Dempsey v. Sewell Coal Co., BRB 03-0615 BLA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Black Lung Complaints
    • June 28, 2004
    ...month in which claimant became totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis. 20 C.F.R. §725.503; see Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600, 12 BLR 2-178 (3d Cir. 1989); Lykins v. Director, OWCP, 12 BLR 1-181 (1989). If the date of onset of total disability due to pneumoconiosis......
  • Dalton v. Frontier-Kemper Constructors, Inc., BRB 11-0852 BLA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Black Lung Complaints
    • December 7, 2012
    ...20 C.F.R. §725.503(b), (d)(1); Owens v. Jewell Smokeless Coal Corp., 14 BLR 1-47 (1990); see Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Krecota, 868 F.2d 600, 603-04, 12 BLR 2-178, 2-184-85 (3d Cir. 1989). As neither Dr. Beck nor Dr. Cohen opined that the miner was disabled due to pneumoconiosis in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT