Rock River Paper Co. v. Fish
Decision Date | 27 October 1881 |
Citation | 47 Mich. 212,10 N.W. 344 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Parties | ROCK RIVER PAPER CO. v. FISH. |
Testator by his will provided as follows: etc. He then appointed five persons "as executors to carry ont the foregoing will, and they are to have the control and direction of my beloved son Francis, during his minority, and the above-named executors a majority of them, are authorized to choose their own successors in office."
Held that the will did not convey the estate to the executors named in trust, but only made them executors with certain additional powers, under which, in certain contingencies, the estate might be made to pass from the son to others. Until the contingencies happened the estate would not pass to the son, who was heir at law.
Of the five executors named only one qualified. He acted as sole executor for many years, and died without completing a settlement. The annuity of $l,000, was paid to Francis till he was of the age of 24, but no other payments were made to him. He died without issue at the age of 25 years and 3 months leaving a will by which his wife was made devisee of his estate. The acting executor never determined whether the conduct of Francis was satisfactory, or undertook to execute the power given by the will.
Held that assuming the power given by the will to be valid, it could only be executed by the five persons named, or by the number kept good as by the will provided; and that it could only be executed after the payments to be made to the son at and before the time of his reaching the age of 25 had been actually made. Therefore in this case the power to pass the estate from the son could never have been executed.
The provision for the son dying without issue, means his dying without issue after it had been determined by the executors as provided by the will, that the conduct and promise of the son are unsatisfactory; and that determination having never been made, and the son remaining owner at the time of his death, the estate passed under his will of the son to his devisee.
Error to Calhoun.
Lyman P. Perkins, for plaintiffs in error.
William H. Porter, for defendant in error.
This action is ejectment, brought by the defendant in error to recover certain lands which in his life-time belonged to Joseph Sibley. Her title to the land she traces through the will of her late husband Francis M. Sibley who was the son and only heir at law of Joseph Sibley. No question is made that she is entitled to recover provided her husband was seized at the time of his decease. Joseph Sibley died September 7, 1864, and the questions of law arise upon his will, a copy of which is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial