Rock v. Keller
Decision Date | 22 December 1925 |
Docket Number | No. 25131.,25131. |
Citation | 278 S.W. 759 |
Parties | ROCK et al. v. KELLER et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Johnson County; Ewing Cockrell, Judge.
Action by Johanna Rock and others against Robert Keller and others, to contest the will of Alice Keller, deceased. Judgment for contestants, and proponents appeal. Affirmed.
Thurman L. McCormick, of Kansas City, and W. E. Suddath, of Warrensburg, for appellants.
Adolphus Musser, of Holden, and M. D. Aber, of Warrensburg, for respondents.
This is an action to contest the will of Alice Keller, resulting in a unanimous verdict for the plaintiffs. The contestants, who are the children of Joseph and Frank Keller, deceased, brothers of the testatrix, Alice Keller, live in or near Baltimore, Md. The proponents of the will are two brothers, Robert and Ishmael Keller, and the wife and children of Ishmael Keller, and William Walter Brady, the executor of the will. The will provides:
(The words italicized are interlined in the will.)
The will was witnessed by Z. P. Gilmer, Mary R. Gilmer, and Mercer W. Gilmer. It was admitted to probate in Johnson county, Mo., in June, 1921, and letters testamentary were issued to William Walter Brady, as executor, who duly qualified as such.
The petition, filed in the circuit court of Johnson county on December 15, 1921, for grounds of contest, alleges:
"Plaintiff avers that said paper writing is not, in truth and in fact, the will of said Alice Keller nor was it her will at the time of its pretended execution, nor was the same executed by her, if at all, while she was of sound mind and disposing memory; but, if the same was ever executed by her at all, it was while she was of unsound mind, extremely ill and feeble in body and mind, and wholly incapable of making or executing a valid testamentary disposition of her property, and, if she did execute said instrument or sign her name thereto, the same was procured to be signed by her by fraud, deception, threats, and undue influence of the defendants, or by and through their procurement, and in their interest and behalf, and through the influence and direction of the will and direction of decedent's sister, Marian Virginia Keller, who had held the property hereinafter described as a joint tenant with decedent, and who wholly dominated the mind of the decedent Alice Keller, and who died a few hours before her, and at a time when said Alice was extremely ill, and in immediate expectation of death, and whose purpose and will it was that the paper writing mentioned should be to the effect which it would have had, if it had been in fact the will of the said Alice."
The answer admits the relationship of the plaintiffs to Alice Keller as pleaded, admits the execution of the will and its probate, denies all other allegations, and formally propounds the will. The proponents made formal proof of the execution of the will and that the testatrix was of sound mind at the time of its execution.
The evidence for the contestants is very briefly summarized in respondents' statement, which, with a few unimportant changes, reads:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Warren
... ... Douglas, 312 Mo. 373, 278 S.W. 1026; State v. McKenzie, 102 Mo. 620; State v. Weeden, 133 Mo. 70; State v. Craft, 299 Mo. 332, 253 S.W. 228; Rock v. Keller, 312 Mo. 458, 278 S.W. 766; State v. Burns, 312 Mo. 673, 280 S.W. 1032. (4) The court erred in failing to give to the jury a correct ... ...
-
Pulitzer v. Chapman
... ... Pollack, 319 Mo. 744, 8 S.W. (2d) 38; Fowler v. Fowler, 318 Mo. 1078, 2 S.W. (2d) 707; Hartman v. Hartman, 314 Mo. 305, 284 S.W. 488; Rock v. Keller, 312 Mo. 458, 278 S.W. 759; Ray v. Walker, 293 Mo. 447, 240 S.W. 187. (7) The trial court properly ruled that it was error to refuse ... ...
-
Van Houten v. K.C. Pub. Serv. Co., 19033.
... ... Poor, 286 Mo. 644, l.c. 658, 228 S.W. 810, l.c. 814-815; Messer v. Gentry, 220 Mo. App. 1294, l.c. 1301, 290 S.W. 1014, l.c. 1016-1017; Rock v. Keller, 312 Mo. 458, l.c. 477, 489, 278 S.W. 759, l.c. 764, 768; Gardner v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 85 S.W. (2d) 86, l.c. 89-90; Scism v ... ...
-
Heath v. Salisbury Home Telephone Co.
... ... Rock v. Keller, 312 Mo. 458, 278 S. W. 759, 768. Defendants have severely criticised this instruction because it submits the presumption in the face of ... ...