Rockefeller v. Orans

Decision Date11 October 1965
Docket NumberNo. 319,319
Citation15 L.Ed.2d 13,86 S.Ct. 75,382 U.S. 10
PartiesNelson A. ROCKEFELLER, Governor of New York, et al. v. Jerome T. ORANS et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Thomas E. Dewey, Leonard Joseph and Malcolm H. Bell, for appellants.

Justin N. Feldman, for appellee Orans.

PER CURIAM.

On April 14, 1965, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that the New York Laws of 1964, cc. 976, 977, 978, 979, 981, were invalid under the New York Constitution, Art. III, § 2. On July 13, 1965, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York enjoined interference with an election of members of the New York Legislature to be held on November 2, 1965, based on 'the scheme set forth' in the New York Laws of 1964, c. 976. Insofar as the decision of the Court of Appeals has been superseded by the order of the District Court, the appeal is dismissed. In all other respects, the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice HARLAN, see WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, 86 S.Ct. 24.]

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Ince v. Rockefeller
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 30, 1968
    ...appeal therefrom by the State officials to the Supreme Court was dismissed for want of a federal question. (Rockefeller v. Orans, 382 U.S. 10, 86 S.Ct. 75, 15 L.Ed. 2d 13 (1965)). Nevertheless, the three-judge district court in W.M.C.A., Inc. v. Lomenzo (61 Civ.1559) on May 24, 1965 ordered......
  • Orans, Matter of
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 9, 1965
    ...by the Supreme Court of the United States. (WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo, 86 S.Ct. 24, decided Oct. 11, 1965.) The Supreme Court, Rockefeller v. Orans, 86 S.Ct. 75, on the same day decided the appeal in Matter of Orans (supra) in a per curiam memorandum which, in part, held: 'Insofar as the decisi......
  • Harkenrider v. Hochul
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 21, 2022
    ...and limitation" ( Matter of Orans , 15 N.Y.2d 339, 352, 258 N.Y.S.2d 825, 206 N.E.2d 854 [1965], appeal dismissed 382 U.S. 10, 86 S.Ct. 75, 15 L.Ed.2d 13 [1965] ).We conclude that the New York State Constitution is silent as to the appropriate procedure to be utilized in the event that the ......
  • Bush v. Martin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • January 5, 1966
    ...v. Lomenzo, 1965, 382 U.S. 9, 86 S.Ct. 49, 15 L.Ed.2d 10, affirming S.D.N.Y., 246 F.Supp. 953, July 13, 1965; Rockefeller v. Orans, 1965, 382 U.S. 10, 86 S.Ct. 75, 15 L.Ed. 2d 13, dismissing appeal from In re Orans, 15 N.Y.2d 339, 258 N.Y.S.2d 825, 206 N.E.2d 854; Screvane v. Lomenzo, 1965,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT