Rockingham County Light & Power Co. v. Batchelder
| Decision Date | 05 December 1905 |
| Parties | ROCKINGHAM COUNTY LIGHT & POWER CO. v. BATCHELDER et al. |
| Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Transferred from Superior Court; Stone, Judge. Petition under Laws 1901, p. 678, c. 195, by the Rockingham County Light & Power Company against George N. Batchelder and another for the assessment of damages occasioned by the taking of the right to maintain a line of poles on defendants' premises. Plaintiff excepted to instructions, and the cause was transferred to the Supreme Court. Overruled.
Samuel W. Emery, for plaintiff. Page & Bartlett, for defendants.
The plaintiffs have not attempted to sustain their exception in this court. The record does not appear to present any question of law which requires consideration. Exception overruled. All concurred.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
State v. La Palme
...has been occasionally condoned, recently criticized (State v. Hazzard, N.H., 179 A.2d 282) and never commended. Rockingham &c. Co. v. Batchelder, 73 N.H. 607, 62 A. 1135; Musgrove v. Parker, 84 N.H. 550, 552, 153 A. 320; Bell Shops, Inc. v. Rosenblatt, 98 N.H. 162, 163, 96 A.2d 204. In view......
-
State v. Hazzard
...from lower courts in which the appellant or the moving party neglects to file a brief or present an argument. Rockingham &c. Co. v. Batchelder, 73 N.H. 607, 62 A. 1135; Musgrove v. Parker, 84 N.H. 550, 552, 153 A. 320; Bell Shops, Inc. v. Rosenblatt, 98 N.H. 162, 163, 96 A.2d 204. The rules......
-
Bell Shops of New Hampshire v. Rosenblatt
...yesterday, the plaintiff had filed no brief and presented no oral argument in support of its exceptions. Rockingham County Light & Power Co. v. Batchelder, 73 N.H. 607, 62 A. 1135. Whether the plaintiff's case had any merit or not, it has served the purpose of keeping the plaintiff in posse......