Rodriguez v. American Export Lines, Inc.
| Decision Date | 14 April 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 35624.,35624. |
| Citation | 253 F. Supp. 36 |
| Parties | Angel RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INC. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
S. Gerald Litvin, Freedman, Borowsky & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.
Bernard J. McNulty, Jr., Costigan & McNulty, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.
This is a motion by defendant to dismiss this seaman's action for improper venue or to transfer it to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York or to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens.
Plaintiff, a merchant seaman aboard the S/S EXPRESS was seriously injured in August 1963 while the ship was in the port of Bombay, India. Following three weeks' hospitalization in Bombay, plaintiff was returned to the United States where he received inpatient treatment at the Staten Island Marine Hospital. According to uncontroverted facts from the briefs, Rodriguez is a resident of New York City and defendant maintains its principal office for the conduct of business therein. The plaintiff received medical treatment in the City of New York. The last relevant factor raised as to grounds for transfer is that plaintiff's counsel maintains offices in New York.
Suit was instituted on April 23, 1964. On May 15, 1964, defendant's counsel entered its appearance and answered on July 6, 1964. Defendant did not move to dismiss for improper venue until October 25, 1965. Defendant, incidentally, noticed plaintiff for deposition in Philadelphia on May 13, 1964.
Defendant contends that this action should be dismissed for improper venue because a suit under the Jones Act must be commenced in the district where the ship owner-employer maintains his principal office for the conduct of business or in the district in which he resides, which in the case of a corporation would be the appropriate district in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Defendant herein is not incorporated in Pennsylvania nor maintains its principal place of business therein. See Leith v. Oil Transport Co., 321 F.2d 591 (3rd Cir. 1963).
While defendant would have had a valid objection if properly raised, he has waived any objection based on improper venue. Subdivision (h) of F.R. Civil P. 12 provides for waiver of all defenses and objections which defendant does not present by motion under Subdivision (b) before answering or in his answer or reply. Defendant has done neither in this case and has consequently waived any objections based on improper venue.
As for the motion to transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), defendant has not met his substantial...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Dangerfield v. Bachman Foods, Inc., Civ. No. A2-80-92.
...Y.1974); B. M. Heede, Inc. v. West India Machinery and Supply Co., 272 F.Supp. 236, 241 (S.D.N.Y.1967); Rodriguez v. American Export Lines, Inc., 253 F.Supp. 36, 37 (E.D. Penn.1966); Lapides v. Doner, 248 F.Supp. 883, 894 (E.D.Mich.1965). See generally Annot., 10 A.L.R.Fed. 352 (1972); 15 W......
-
Altman v. LIBERTY EQUITIES CORPORATION
...Procedure § 1352 pp. 572-573. I note, however, some conflict of opinion on this technical matter. Compare Rodriguez v. American Export Lines, Inc., 253 F.Supp. 36, 37 (E.D.Pa. 1966) (§ 1404(a) motion considered after answer, but venue objection waived), Fallbrook Public Utility District v. ......
-
James v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.
...and objections which are not presented by motion under Rule 12(b) before answering or in the answer. Rodriguez v. American Export Lines, Inc., 253 F.Supp. 36 (E.D.Pa. 1966).1 In connection with a § 1404(a) motion, the defendant may not object to plaintiff's inconvenience caused by his selec......
-
Myers v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
...their testimony would be. Baksay v. Rensellear Polytech Institute, 281 F.Supp. 1007 (S. D.N.Y.1968); Rodriguez v. American Export Lines, Inc., 253 F.Supp. 36 (E.D. Pa.1966); McKinney v. Southern Pacific Co., 147 F.Supp. 954 One of the most crucial factors which must be showed by a movant in......